Skip to main content
\(\require{cancel}\)
Physics LibreTexts

1.2: Photon Polarization

It is known experimentally that if plane polarized light is used to eject photo-electrons then there is a preferred direction of emission of the electrons. Clearly, the polarization properties of light, which are more usually associated with its wave-like behavior, also extend to its particle-like behavior. In particular, a polarization can be ascribed to each individual photon in a beam of light.

Consider the following well-known experiment. A beam of plane polarized light is passed through a polarizing film, which is normal to the beam's direction of propagation, and which has the property that it is only transparent to light whose plane of polarization lies perpendicular to its optic axis (which is assumed to lie in the plane of the film). Classical electromagnetic wave theory tells us that if the beam is polarized perpendicular to the optic axis then all of the light is transmitted, if the beam is polarized parallel to the optic axis then none of the light is transmitted, and if the light is polarized at an angle \(\alpha\) to the axis then a fraction \(\sin^2 \alpha\) of the beam energy is transmitted. Let us try to account for these observations at the individual photon level.

A beam of light that is plane polarized in a certain direction is made up of a stream of photons which are each plane polarized in that direction. This picture leads to no difficulty if the plane of polarization lies parallel or perpendicular to the optic axis of the polarizing film. In the former case, none of the photons are transmitted, and, in the latter case, all of the photons are transmitted. But, what happens in the case of an obliquely polarized incident beam?

The previous question is not very precise. Let us reformulate it as a question relating to the result of some experiment that we could perform. Suppose that we were to fire a single photon at a polarizing film, and then look to see whether or not it emerges on the other side. The possible results of the experiment are that either a whole photon (whose energy is equal to the energy of the incident photon) is observed, or no photon is observed. Any photon that is transmitted though the film must be polarized perpendicular to the film's optic axis. Furthermore, it is impossible to imagine (in physics) finding part of a photon on the other side of the film. If we repeat the experiment a great number of times then, on average, a fraction \(\sin^2 \alpha\) of the photons are transmitted through the film, and a fraction \(\cos^2 \alpha\) are absorbed. Thus, given that the trials are statistically independent of one another, we must conclude that a photon has a probability \(\sin^2 \alpha\) of being transmitted as a photon polarized in the plane perpendicular to the optic axis, and a probability \(\cos^2 \alpha\) of being absorbed. These values for the probabilities lead to the correct classical limit for a beam containing a large number of photons.

Note that we have only been able to preserve the individuality of photons, in all cases, by abandoning the determinacy of classical theory, and adopting a fundamentally probabilistic approach. We have no way of knowing whether an individual obliquely polarized photon is going to be absorbed by, or transmitted through, a polarizing film. We only know the probability of each event occurring. This is a fairly sweeping statement. Recall, however, that the state of a photon is fully specified once its energy, direction of propagation, and polarization are known. If we imagine performing experiments using monochromatic light, normally incident on a polarizing film, with a particular oblique polarization, then the state of each individual photon in the beam is completely specified, and nothing remains to uniquely determine whether the photon is transmitted or absorbed by the film.

The above discussion about the results of an experiment with a single obliquely polarized photon incident on a polarizing film answers all that can be legitimately asked about what happens to the photon when it reaches the film. Questions as to what determines whether the photon is transmitted or not, or how it changes its direction of polarization, are illegitimate, because they do not relate to the outcome of a possible experiment. Nevertheless, some further description is needed, in order to allow the results of this experiment to be correlated with the results of other experiments that can be performed using photons.

The further description provided by quantum mechanics is as follows. It is supposed that a photon polarized obliquely to the optic axis can be regarded as being partly in a state of polarization parallel to the axis, and partly in a state of polarization perpendicular to the axis. In other words, the oblique polarization state is some sort of superposition of two states of parallel and perpendicular polarization. Because there is nothing special about the orientation of the optic axis in our experiment, we deduce that any state of polarization can be regarded as a superposition of two mutually perpendicular states of polarization. When we cause a photon to encounter a polarizing film, we are subjecting it to an observation. In fact, we are observing whether it is polarized parallel or perpendicular to the film's optic axis. The effect of making this observation is to force the photon entirely into a state of parallel or perpendicular polarization. In other words, the photon has to jump suddenly from being partly in each of these two states to being entirely in one or the other of them. Which of the two states it will jump into cannot be predicted, but is governed by probability laws. If the photon jumps into a state of parallel polarization then it is absorbed. Otherwise, it is transmitted. Note that, in this example, the introduction of indeterminacy into the problem is clearly connected with the act of observation. In other words, the indeterminacy is related to the inevitable disturbance of the system associated with the act of observation.

Contributors