# 11.2: Particle Conservation Laws

Conservation laws are critical to an understanding of particle physics. Strong evidence exists that energy, momentum, and angular momentum are all conserved in all particle interactions. The annihilation of an electron and positron at rest, for example, cannot produce just one photon because this violates the conservation of linear momentum. As discussed in Relativity, the special theory of relativity modifies definitions of momentum, energy, and other familiar quantities. In particular, the relativistic momentum of a particle differs from its classical momentum by a factor \(\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - (v/c)^2}\) that varies from 1 to \(\infty\), depending on the speed of the particle.

In previous chapters, we encountered other conservation laws as well. For example, charge is conserved in all electrostatic phenomena. Charge lost in one place is gained in another because charge is carried by particles. No known physical processes violate charge conservation. In the next section, we describe three less-familiar conservation laws: baryon number, lepton number, and strangeness. These are by no means the only conservation laws in particle physics.

# Baryon Number Conservation

No conservation law considered thus far prevents a neutron from decaying via a reaction such as \[n \rightarrow e^+ + e^-.\]

This process conserves charge, energy, and momentum. However, it does not occur because it violates the law of baryon number conservation. This law requires that the total baryon number of a reaction is the same before and after the reaction occurs. To determine the total baryon number, every elementary particle is assigned a baryon number *B*. The baryon number has the value \(B = +1\) for baryons, –1 for antibaryons, and 0 for all other particles. Returning to the above case (the decay of the neutron into an electron-positron pair), the neutron has a value \(B = +1\), whereas the electron and the positron each has a value of 0. Thus, the decay does not occur because the total baryon number changes from 1 to 0. However, the proton-antiproton collision process

\[p + \overline{p} \rightarrow p + p \overline{p} + \overline{p},\]

*does* satisfy the law of conservation of baryon number because the baryon number is zero before and after the interaction. The baryon number for several common particles is given in Table.

Particle name | Symbol | Lepton number \((L_e)\) | Lepton number \((L_{\mu})\) | Lepton number \((L_{\tau})\) | Baryon number (B) | Strange-ness number |

Electron | \(e^-\) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Electron neutrino | \(\nu_e\) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Muon | \(\mu^-\) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Muon neutrino | \(\nu_{\mu}\) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Tau | \(\tau^-\) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |

Tau neutrino | \(\nu_{\tau}\) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |

Pion | \(\pi^+\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Positive kaon | \(K^+\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |

Negative kaon | \(K^-\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | –1 |

Proton | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |

Neutron | n | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |

Lambda zero | \(\Lambda^0\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –1 |

Positive sigma | \(\sum^+\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –1 |

Negative sigma | \(\sum^-\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –1 |

Xi zero | \(\Xi^0\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –2 |

Negative xi | \(\Xi^-\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –2 |

Omega | \(\Omega^-\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –3 |

Conserved Properties of Particles

Example

**Baryon Number Conservation**

Based on the law of conservation of baryon number, which of the following reactions can occur?

\[(a)\space \pi^- + p \rightarrow \pi^0 + n + \pi^- + \pi^+\]

\[(b)\space p + \overline{p} \rightarrow p + p + \overline{p}\]

**Strategy**

Determine the total baryon number for the reactants and products, and require that this value does not change in the reaction.

**Solution**

For reaction (a), the net baryon number of the two reactants is \(0 + 1 = 1\) and the net baryon number of the four products is \(0 + 1 + 0 + 0 = 1\).

Since the net baryon numbers of the reactants and products are equal, this reaction is allowed on the basis of the baryon number conservation law.

For reaction (b), the net baryon number of the reactants is \(1 + (-1) = 0\) and the net baryon number of the proposed products is \(1 + 1 + (-1) = 1\). Since the net baryon numbers of the reactants and proposed products are not equal, this reaction cannot occur.

**Significance**

Baryon number is conserved in the first reaction, but not in the second. Baryon number conservation constrains what reactions can and cannot occur in nature.

**Check Your Understanding** What is the baryon number of a hydrogen nucleus?

[Hide Solution]

1

# Lepton Number Conservation

Lepton number conservation states that the sum of lepton numbers before and after the interaction must be the same. There are three different **lepton number****s**: the electron-lepton number \(L_e\), the muon-lepton number \(L_{\mu}\), and the tau-lepton number \(L_{\tau}\). In any interaction, each of these quantities must be conserved *separately*. For electrons and electron neutrinos, \(L_e = 1\); for their antiparticles, \(L_e = -1\); all other particles have \(L_e = 0\). Similarly, \(L_{\mu} = 1\) for muons and muon neutrinos, \(L_{\mu} = -1\) for their antiparticles, and \(L_{\mu} = 0\) for all other particles. Finally, \(L_{\tau} = 1, \space -1\), or 0, depending on whether we have a tau or tau neutrino, their antiparticles, or any other particle, respectively. Lepton number conservation guarantees that the number of electrons and positrons in the universe stays relatively constant. (*Note:* The total lepton number is, as far as we know, conserved in nature. However, observations have shown variations of family lepton number (for example, \(L_e\)) in a phenomenon called *neutrino oscillations.*)

To illustrate the lepton number conservation law, consider the following known two-step decay process:

\[\pi^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ + \nu_{\mu}\]

\[\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+ + \nu_e + \overline{\nu}_{\mu}.\]

In the first decay, all of the lepton numbers for \(\pi^+\) are 0. For the products of this decay, \(L_{\mu} = -1\) for \(\mu^+\) and \(L_{\mu} = 1\) for \(\nu_{\mu}\). Therefore, muon-lepton number is conserved. Neither electrons nor tau are involved in this decay, so \(L_e = 0\) and \(L_{\tau} = 0\) for the initial particle and all decay products. Thus, electron-lepton and tau-lepton numbers are also conserved. In the second decay, \(\mu^+\) has a muon-lepton number \(L_{\mu} = -1\), whereas the net muon-lepton number of the decay products is \(0 + 0 + (-1) = -1\). Thus, the muon-lepton number is conserved. Electron-lepton number is also conserved, as \(L_e = 0\) for \(\mu^+\), whereas the net electron-lepton number of the decay products is \((-1) + 1 + 0 = 0\). Finally, since no taus or tau-neutrons are involved in this decay, the tau-lepton number is also conserved.

Example

**Lepton Number Conservation**

Based on the law of conservation of lepton number, which of the following decays can occur?

\[(a) \space n \rightarrow p + e^- + \overline{\nu}_e\]

\[(b) \space \pi^- \rightarrow \mu^- + \nu_{\mu} + \overline{\nu}_{\mu}\]

**Strategy**

Determine the total lepton number for the reactants and products, and require that this value does not change in the reaction.

**Solution**

For decay (a), the electron-lepton number of the neutron is 0, and the net electron-lepton number of the decay products is \(0 + 1 + (-1) = 0\).

Since the net electron-lepton numbers before and after the decay are the same, the decay is possible on the basis of the law of conservation of electron-lepton number. Also, since there are no muons or taus involved in this decay, the muon-lepton and tauon-lepton numbers are conserved.

For decay (b), the muon-lepton number of the \(\pi^-\) is 0, and the net muon-lepton number of the proposed decay products is \(1 + 1 + (-1) = 1\).

Thus, on the basis of the law of conservation of muon-lepton number, this decay cannot occur.

**Significance**

Lepton number is conserved in the first reaction, but not in the second. Lepton number conservation constrains what reactions can and cannot occur in nature.

**Check Your Understanding** What is the lepton number of an electron-positron pair?

[Hide Solution]

0

# Strangeness Conservation

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, cosmic-ray experiments revealed the existence of particles that had never been observed on Earth. These particles were produced in collisions of pions with protons or neutrons in the atmosphere. Their production and decay were unusual. They were produced in the strong nuclear interactions of pions and nucleons, and were therefore inferred to be hadrons; however, their decay was mediated by the much more slowly acting weak nuclear interaction. Their lifetimes were on the order of \(10^{-10}\) to \(10^{-8} s\), whereas a typical lifetime for a particle that decays via the strong nuclear reaction is \(10^{-23}s\). These particles were also unusual because they were always produced in pairs in the pion-nucleon collisions. For these reasons, these newly discovered particles were described as *strange*. The production and subsequent decay of a pair of strange particles is illustrated in Figure and follows the reaction

\[\pi^- + p \rightarrow \Lambda^0 + K^0.\]

The lambda particle then decays through the weak nuclear interaction according to

\[\Lambda^0 \rightarrow \pi^- + p,\]

and the kaon decays via the weak interaction

\[K^0 \rightarrow \pi^+ + \pi^-.\]

**Figure 11.2.1. ** The interactions of hadrons. (a) Bubble chamber photograph; (b) sketch that represents the photograph.

To rationalize the behavior of these strange particles, particle physicists invented a particle property conserved in strong interactions but not in weak interactions. This property is called **strangeness** and, as the name suggests, is associated with the presence of a strange quark. The strangeness of a particle is equal to the number of strange quarks of the particle. Strangeness conservation requires the total strangeness of a reaction or decay (summing the strangeness of all the particles) is the same before and after the interaction. Strangeness conservation is not absolute: It is conserved in strong interactions and electromagnetic interactions but not in weak interactions. The strangeness number for several common particles is given in Table.

Example

**Strangeness Conservation**

(a) Based on the conservation of strangeness, can the following reaction occur?

\[\pi^- + p \rightarrow K^+ + K^- + n.\]

(b) The following decay is mediated by the weak nuclear force:

\[K^+ \rightarrow \pi^+ + \pi^0.\]

Does the decay conserve strangeness? If not, can the decay occur?

**Strategy**

Determine the strangeness of the reactants and products and require that this value does not change in the reaction.

**Solution**

- The net strangeness of the reactants is \(0 + 0 = 0\), and the net strangeness of the products is \(1 + (-1) + 0 = 0\).
- Thus, the strong nuclear interaction between a pion and a proton is not forbidden by the law of conservation of strangeness. Notice that baryon number is also conserved in the reaction.
- The net strangeness before and after this decay is 1 and 0, so the decay does not conserve strangeness. However, the decay may still be possible, because the law of conservation of strangeness does not apply to weak decays.

**Significance**

Strangeness is conserved in the first reaction, but not in the second. Strangeness conservation constrains what reactions can and cannot occur in nature.

**Check Your Understanding** What is the strangeness number of a muon?

[Hide Solution]

0

# Summary

- Elementary particle interactions are governed by particle conservation laws, which can be used to determine what particle reactions and decays are possible (or forbidden).
- The baryon number conservation law and the three lepton number conversation law are valid for all physical processes. However, conservation of strangeness is valid only for strong nuclear interactions and electromagnetic interactions.

# Conceptual Questions

Exercise

What are six particle conservation laws? Briefly describe them.

Conservation energy, momentum, and charge (familiar to classical and relativistic mechanics). Also, conservation of baryon number, lepton number, and strangeness—numbers that do not change before and after a collision or decay.

Exercise

In general, how do we determine if a particle reaction or decay occurs?

Exercise

Why might the detection of particle interaction that violates an established particle conservation law be considered a *good* thing for a scientist?

It means that the theory that requires the conservation law is not understood. The failure of a long-established theory often leads to a deeper understanding of nature.

# Problems

Exercise

Which of the following decays cannot occur because the law of conservation of lepton number is violated?

(a) \(n \rightarrow p + e^-\) (e) \(\pi^- \rightarrow e^- + \overline{\nu}_e\)

(b) \(\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+ + \nu_e\) (f) \(\mu^- \rightarrow e^- + \overline{\nu}_e + \nu_{\mu}\)

(c) \(\pi^+ \rightarrow e^+ + \nu_e + \overline{\nu}_{\mu}\) (g) \(\Lambda^0 \rightarrow \pi^- + p\)

(d) \(p \rightarrow n + e^+ + \nu_e\) (h) \(K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ + \nu_{\mu}\)

[Hide Solution]

a, b, and c

Exercise

Which of the following reactions cannot because the law of conservation of strangeness is violated?

(a) \(p + n \rightarrow p + p + \pi^-\) (e) \(K^- + p \rightarrow \Xi^0 + K^+ + \pi^-\)

(b) \(p + n \rightarrow p + p + K^-\) (f) \(K^- + p \rightarrow \Xi^0 + \pi^- + \pi^-\)

(c) \(K^- + p \rightarrow K^- + \sum^+\) (g) \(\pi^+ + p \rightarrow \sum^+ + K^+\)

(d) \(\pi^- + p \rightarrow K^+ + \sum^-\) (h) \(\pi^- + n \rightarrow K^- + \Lambda^0\)

Identify one possible decay for each of the following antiparticles:

(a) \(\overline{n}\), (b) \(\overline{Lambda}^0\), (c) \(\Omega^+\), (d) \(K^-\), and (e) \(\overline{\sum}\).

[Hide Solution]

a. \(\overline{p}_e + \nu e\); b. \(\overline{p}\pi^+\) or \(\overline{p}\pi^0\); c. \(\overline{\Xi}^0\) or \(\overline{\Lambda}^0 K^+\); d. \(\mu^- \overline{\nu}_{\mu}\) or \(\pi^- \pi^0\); e. \(\overline{p}\pi^0\) or \(\overline{n}\pi^-\)

Exercise

Each of the following strong nuclear reactions is forbidden. Identify a conservation law that is violated for each one.

(a) \(p + \overline{p} \rightarrow p + n + \overline{p}\)

(b) \(p + n \rightarrow p + \overline{p} + n + \pi^+\)

(c) \(\pi^- + p \rightarrow \sum^+ + K^-\)

(d) \(K^- + p \rightarrow \Lambda^0 + n\)

## Glossary

**baryon number**

baryon number has the value \(B = +1\) for baryons, \(-1\) for antibaryons, and 0 for all other particles and is conserved in particle interactions

**lepton number**

electron-lepton number \(L_e\) the muon-lepton number \(L_{\mu}\), and the tau-lepton number \(L_{\tau}\) are conserved separately in every particle interaction

**strangeness**

particle property associated with the presence of a strange quark