Skip to main content
Physics LibreTexts

22A: Center of Mass, Moment of Inertia

A mistake that crops up in the calculation of moments of inertia, involves the Parallel Axis Theorem. The mistake is to interchange the moment of inertia of the axis through the center of mass, with the one parallel to that, when applying the Parallel Axis Theorem. Recognizing that the subscript “CM” in the parallel axis theorem stands for “center of mass” will help one avoid this mistake. Also, a check on the answer, to make sure that the value of the moment of inertia with respect to the axis through the center of mass is smaller than the other moment of inertia, will catch the mistake.

Center of Mass

Consider two particles, having one and the same mass m, each of which is at a different position on the x axis of a Cartesian coordinate system.

Common sense tells you that the average position of the material making up the two particles is midway between the two particles. Common sense is right. We give the name “center of mass” to the average position of the material making up a distribution, and the center of mass of a pair of same-mass particles is indeed midway between the two particles.

How about if one of the particles is more massive than the other? One would expect the center of mass to be closer to the more massive particle, and again, one would be right. To determine the position of the center of mass of the distribution of matter in such a case, we compute a weighted sum of the positions of the particles in the distribution, where the weighting factor for a given particle is that fraction, of the total mass, that the particle’s own mass is. Thus, for two particles on the \(x\) axis, one of mass \(m_1\), at \(x_1\), and the other of mass \(m_2\), at \(x_2\),

the position \(\bar{x}\) of the center of mass is given by

\[\bar{x}=\frac{m_1}{m_1+m_2} x_1+ \frac{m_2}{m_1+m_2} x_2  \label{22-1}\]

Note that each weighting factor is a proper fraction and that the sum of the weighting factors is always 1. Also note that if, for instance, \(m_1\) is greater than \(m_2\), then the position \(x_1\) of particle 1 will count more in the sum, thus ensuring that the center of mass is found to be closer to the more massive particle (as we know it must be). Further note that if \(m_1=m_2\), each weighting factor is \(\frac{1}{2}\), as is evident when we substitute m for both \(m_1\) and \(m_2\) in Equation \(\ref{22-1}\): 

\[\bar{x}=\dfrac{m}{m+m} x_1+ \frac{m}{m+m} x_2 \]

\[\bar{x}=\dfrac{1}{2}x_1+\frac{1}{2}x_2 \]

\[\bar{x}=\dfrac{x_1+x_2}{2} \]

The center of mass is found to be midway between the two particles, right where common sense tells us it has to be.

The Center of Mass of a Thin Rod

Quite often, when the finding of the position of the center of mass of a distribution of particles is called for, the distribution of particles is the set of particles making up a rigid body. The easiest rigid body for which to calculate the center of mass is the thin rod because it extends in only one dimension. (Here, we discuss an ideal thin rod. A physical thin rod must have some nonzero diameter. The ideal thin rod, however, is a good approximation to the physical thin rod as long as the diameter of the rod is small compared to its length.)

In the simplest case, the calculation of the position of the center of mass is trivial. The simplest case involves a uniform thin rod. A uniform thin rod is one for which the linear mass density \(\mu\), the mass-per-length of the rod, has one and the same value at all points on the rod. The center of mass of a uniform rod is at the center of the rod. So, for instance, the center of mass of a uniform rod that extends along the x axis from \(x=0\) to \(x=L\) is at (L/2, 0).

The linear mass density \(\mu\), typically called linear density when the context is clear, is a measure of how closely packed the elementary particles making up the rod are. Where the linear density is high, the particles are close together.

To picture what is meant by a non-uniform rod, a rod whose linear density is a function of position, imagine a thin rod made of an alloy consisting of lead and aluminum. Further imagine that the percentage of lead in the rod varies smoothly from 0% at one end of the rod to 100% at the other. The linear density of such a rod would be a function of the position along the length of the rod. A one-millimeter segment of the rod at one position would have a different mass than that of a one-millimeter segment of the rod at a different position.

People with some exposure to calculus have an easier time understanding what linear density is than calculus-deprived individuals do because linear density is just the ratio of the amount of mass in a rod segment to the length of the segment, in the limit as the length of the segment goes to zero. Consider a rod that extends from \(0\) to \(L\) along the \(x\) axis. Now suppose that \(m_s(x)\) is the mass of that segment of the rod extending from \(0\) to \(x\) where \(x\ge0\) but \(x<L\). Then, the linear density of the rod at any point x along the rod, is just \(\frac{dm_s}{dx}\) evaluated at the value of \(x\) in question.

Now that you have a good idea of what we mean by linear mass density, we are going to illustrate how one determines the position of the center of mass of a non-uniform thin rod by means of an example.

Example 22-1

Find the position of the center of mass of a thin rod that extends from \(0\) to \(.890\)m along the \(x\) axis of a Cartesian coordinate system and has a linear density given by \(\mu(x)=0.650\frac{kg}{m^3}x^2\).

Solution

In order to be able to determine the position of the center of mass of a rod with a given length and a given linear density as a function of position, you first need to be able to find the mass of such a rod. To do that, one might be tempted to use a method that works only for the special case of a uniform rod, namely, to try using \(m=\mu L\) with \(L\) being the length of the rod. The problem with this is, that \(\mu\) varies along the entire length of the rod. What value would one use for \(\mu\)? One might be tempted to evaluate the given \(\mu\) at \(x=L\) and use that, but that would be acting as if the linear density were constant at \(\mu=\mu (L)\). It is not. In fact, in the case at hand, \(\mu(L)\) is the maximum linear density of the rod, it only has that value at one point on the rod. 

What we can do is to say that the infinitesimal amount of mass \(dm\) in a segment \(dx\) of the rod is \(\mu dx\). Here we are saying that at some position \(x\) on the rod, the amount of mass in the infinitesimal length \(dx\) of the rod is the value of \(\mu\) at that \(x\) value, times the infinitesimal length \(dx\). Here we don’t have to worry about the fact that \(\mu\) changes with position since the segment \(dx\) is infinitesimally long, meaning, essentially, that it has zero length, so the whole segment is essentially at one position \(x\) and hence the value of \(\mu\) at that \(x\) is good for the whole segment \(dx\).

\[dm=\mu (x) dx   \label{22-2} \]

Now this is true for any value of \(x\), but it just covers an infinitesimal segment of the rod at \(x\). To get the mass of the whole rod, we need to add up all such contributions to the mass. Of course, since each \(dm\) corresponds to an infinitesimal length of the rod, we will have an infinite number of terms in the sum of all the \(dm\)’s. An infinite sum of infinitesimal terms, is an integral.

\[\int dm=\int_{0}{L} \mu (x) dx  \label{22-3}\]

where the values of \(x\) have to run from \(0\) to \(L\) to cover the length of the rod, hence the limits on the right. Now the mathematicians have provided us with a rich set of algorithms for evaluating integrals, and indeed we will have to reach into that toolbox to evaluate the integral on the right, but to evaluate the integral on the left, we cannot, should not, and will not turn to such an algorithm. Instead, we use common sense and our conceptual understanding of what the integral on the left means. In the context of the problem at hand, \(\int dm\) means “the sum of all the infinitesimal bits of mass making up the rod.” Now, if you add up all the infinitesimal bits of mass making up the rod, you get the mass of the rod. So \(\int dm\) is just the mass of the rod, which we will call \(m\). Equation \(\ref{22-3}\) then becomes

\[m=\int_{0}{L} \mu(x) dx \label{22-4}\]

Replacing \(\mu (x)\) with the given expression for the linear density \(\mu=0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3} x^2\) which I choose to write as \(\mu=bx^2\) with \(b\) being defined by \(b=0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3}\) we obtain 

\[m=\int_{0}{L}bx^2dx\]

Factoring out the constant yields

\[m=b\int_{0}{L}x^2dx\]

When integrating the variable of integration raised to a power all we have to do is increase the power by one and divide by the new power. This gives

\[m=b\frac{x^3}{3} \Big |_0^L \]

Evaluating this at the lower and upper limits yields

\[ m=b(\frac{L^3}{3}-\frac{0^3}{3}) \]

\[m=\frac{bL^3}{3} \]

The value of \(L\) is given as \(0.890 m\) and we defined \(b\) to be the constant \(0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3}\) in the given expression for \(\mu\), \(\mu=0.650\frac{kg}{m^3} x^2\), so 

\[ m=\frac{0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3} (0.890m)^3}{3} \]

\[m=0.1527kg\]

That’s a value that will come in handy when we calculate the position of the center of mass. Now, when we calculated the center of mass of a set of discrete particles (where a discrete particle is one that is by itself, as opposed, for instance, to being part of a rigid body) we just carried out a weighted sum in which each term was the position of a particle times its weighting factor and the weighting factor was that fraction, of the total mass, represented by the mass of the particle. We carry out a similar procedure for a continuous distribution of mass such as that which makes up the rod in question. Let’s start by writing one single term of the sum. We’ll consider an infinitesimal length \(dx\) of the rod at a position \(x\) along the length of the rod. The position, as just stated, is \(x\), and the weighting factor is that fraction of the total mass \(m\) of the rod that the mass \(dm\) of the infinitesimal length \(dx\) represents. That means the weighting factor is \(\frac{dm}{m}\) , so, a term in our weighted sum of positions looks like:

\[\frac{dm}{m} x\]

Now, \(dm\) can be expressed as \(\mu\)\(dx\) so our expression for the term in the weighted sum can be written as

\[ \frac{\mu dx}{m} x\]

That’s one term in the weighted sum of positions, the sum that yields the position of the center of mass. The thing is, because the value of \(x\) is unspecified, that one term is good for any infinitesimal segment of the bar. Every term in the sum looks just like that one. So we have an expression for every term in the sum. Of course, because the expression is for an infinitesimal length \(dx\) of the rod, there will be an infinite number of terms in the sum. So, again we have an infinite sum of infinitesimal terms. That is, again we have an integral. Our expression for the position of the center of mass is:

\[\bar{x}=\int_{0}{L} \frac{\mu dx}{m} x\]

Substituting the given expression \(\mu (x)=0.650\frac{kg}{m^3} x^2\) for \(\mu\), which we again write as \(\mu=bx^2\) with \(b\) being defined by \(b=0.650\frac{kg}{m^3} \), yields 

\[\bar{x}=\int_{0}{L} \frac{bx^2 dx}{m} x\]

Rearranging and factoring the constants out gives

\[\bar{x}=\frac{b}{m} \int_{0}{L} x^3 dx\]

Next we carry out the integration

\[\bar{x}=\frac{b}{m} \frac{x^4}{4} \Big |_0^L\]

\[\bar{x}=\frac{b}{m} (\frac{L^4}{4}-\frac{0^4}{4})\]

\[\bar{x}=\frac{bL^4}{4m} \]

Now we substitute values with units; the mass m of the rod that we found earlier, the constant \(b\) that we defined to simplify the appearance of the linear density function, and the given length \(L\) of the rod:

\[\bar{x}=\frac{(0.650\frac{kg}{m^3})(0.890m)^4}{4(0.1527kg)}\]

\[ \bar{x}=0.668m\]

This is our final answer for the position of the center of mass. Note that it is closer to the denser end of the rod, as we would expect. The reader may also be interested to note that had we substituted the expression \(m=\frac{bL^3}{3}\) that we derived for the mass, rather than the value we obtained when we evaluated that expression, our expression for \(\bar{x}\) would have simplified to \(\frac{3}{4} L\) which evaluates to \(\bar{x}=0.668m\), the same result as the one above.

Moment of Inertia—a.k.a. Rotational Inertia

You already know that the moment of inertia of a rigid object, with respect to a specified axis of rotation, depends on the mass of that object, and how that mass is distributed relative to the axis of rotation. In fact, you know that if the mass is packed in close to the axis of rotation, the object will have a smaller moment of inertia than it would if the same mass was more spread out relative to the axis of rotation. Let’s quantify these ideas. (Quantify, in this context, means to put into equation form.)

We start by constructing, in our minds, an idealized object for which the mass is all concentrated at a single location which is not on the axis of rotation: Imagine a massless disk rotating with angular velocity w about an axis through the center of the disk and perpendicular to its faces. Let there be a particle of mass m embedded in the disk at a distance \(r\) from the axis of rotation. Here’s what it looks like from a viewpoint on the axis of rotation, some distance away from the disk:

where the axis of rotation is marked with an \(O\). Because the disk is massless, we call the moment of inertia of the construction, the moment of inertia of a particle, with respect to rotation about an axis from which the particle is a distance \(r\).  

Knowing that the velocity of the particle can be expressed as \(v=r\omega\) you can show yourself how \(I\) must be defined in order for the kinetic energy expression \(K=\frac{1}{2} I \omega^2\) for the object, viewed as a spinning rigid body, to be the same as the kinetic energy expression \(K=\frac{1}{2} m v^2\) for the particle moving through space in a circle. Either point of view is valid so both viewpoints must yield the same kinetic energy. Please go ahead and derive what \(I\) must be and then come back and read the derivation below.

Here is the derivation:

Given that \(K=\frac{1}{2} m v^2\), we replace \(v\) with \(r\omega\).

This gives \(K=\frac{1}{2} m (r\omega)^2\)

which can be written as

\[K=\frac{1}{2} (mr^2) \omega^2\]

For this to be equivalent to

\[ K=\frac{1}{2} I \omega^2\]

we must have

\[ I=mr^2 \label{22-5}\]

This is our result for the moment of inertia of a particle of mass \(m\), with respect to an axis of rotation from which the particle is a distance \(r\).

Now suppose we have two particles embedded in our massless disk, one of mass \(m_1\) at a distance \(r_1\) from the axis of rotation and another of mass \(m_2\) at a distance \(r_2\) from the axis of rotation.

The moment of inertia of the first one by itself would be

\[I_1=m_1 r_1^2\]

and the moment of inertia of the second particle by itself would be

\[I_2=m_2 r_2^2\]

The total moment of inertia of the two particles embedded in the massless disk is simply the sum of the two individual moments of inertial.

\[I=I_1+I_2\]

\[I=m_1 r_1^2+m_2 r_2^2\]

 

This concept can be extended to include any number of particles. For each additional particle, one simply includes another \(m_i r_i^2\) term in the sum where \(m_i\) is the mass of the additional particle and \(r_i\) is the distance that the additional particle is from the axis of rotation. In the case of a rigid object, we subdivide the object up into an infinite set of infinitesimal mass elements \(dm\). Each mass element contributes an amount of moment of inertia

\[dI=r^2dm \label{22-6}\]

to the moment of inertia of the object, where \(r\) is the distance that the particular mass element is from the axis of rotation.

Example 22-2

Find the moment of inertia of the rod in Example \(\ref{22-1}\) with respect to rotation about the z axis.

Solution

In Example \(\ref{22-1}\), the linear density of the rod was given as \(\mu=0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3}x^2\). To reduce the number of times we have to write the value in that expression, we will write it as \(\mu=bx^2\) with \(b\) being defined as \(b=0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3}\). 

The total moment of inertia of the rod is the infinite sum of the infinitesimal contributions

\[dI=r^2 dm \label{22-6} \]

from each and every mass element dm making up the rod.


In the diagram, we have indicated an infinitesimal element \(dx\) of the rod at an arbitrary position on the rod. The z axis, the axis of rotation, looks like a dot in the diagram and the distance \(r\) in \(dI=r^2 dm\), the distance that the bit of mass under consideration is from the axis of rotation, is simply the abscissa x of the position of the mass element. Hence, equation \(\ref{22-6}\) for the case at hand can be written as

\[dI=x^2 dm\]

which we copy here 

\[dI=x^2 dm\]

By definition of the linear mass density \(\mu\), the infinitesimal mass \(dm\) can be expressed as \(dm = \mu dx\). Substituting this into our expression for \(dI\) yields

\[dI=x^2 \mu dx\]

Now \(\mu\) was given as \(bx^2\) (with \(b\) actually being the symbol that I chose to use to represent the given constant \(0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3}\)). Substituting \(bx^2\) in for \(\mu\) in our expression for \(dI\) yields

\[dI=x^2(bx^2)dx\]

\[dI=bx^4dx\]

This expression for the contribution of an element \(dx\) of the rod to the total moment of inertia of the rod is good for every element \(dx\) of the rod. The infinite sum of all such infinitesimal contributions is thus the integral

\[\int dI=\int_{0}{L} bx^4 dx\]

Again, as with our last integration, on the left, we have not bothered with limits of integration— the infinite sum of all the infinitesimal contributions to the moment of inertia is simply the total moment of inertia.

\[I=\int_{0}{L}bx^4 dx\]

On the right we use the limits of integration \(0\) to \(L\) to include every element of the rod which extends from \(x=0\) to \(x=L\), with L given as \(0.890 m\). Factoring out the constant \(b\) gives us

\[I=b \int_{0}{L}x^4 dx\]

Now we carry out the integration:

\[I=b\frac{x^5}{5} \Big|_0^L\]

\[I=b(\frac{L^5}{5}-\frac{0^5}{5})\]

\[I=b\frac{L^5}{5}\]

Substituting the given values of \(b\) and \(L\) yields:

\[I=0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3} \frac{(0.890m)^5}{5}\]

\[I=0.0726 kg\cdot m^2\]

The Parallel Axis Theorem

We state, without proof , the parallel axis theorem:

\[I=I_{cm}+md^2 \label{22-7}\]

in which:

  • \(I\) is the moment of inertia of an object with respect to an axis from which the center of mass of the object is a distance \(d\).
  • \(I_{cm}\) is the moment of inertia of the object with respect to an axis that is parallel to the first axis and passes through the center of mass.
  • \(m\) is the mass of the object 
  • \(d\) is the distance between the two axes.

The parallel axis theorem relates the moment of inertia \(I_{CM}\) of an object, with respect to an axis through the center of mass of the object, to the moment of inertia I of the same object, with respect to an axis that is parallel to the axis through the center of mass and is at a distance d from the axis through the center of mass.

A conceptual statement made by the parallel axis theorem is one that you probably could have arrived at by means of common sense, namely that the moment of inertia of an object with respect to an axis through the center of mass is smaller than the moment of inertia about any axis parallel to that one. As you know, the closer the mass is “packed” to the axis of rotation, the smaller the moment of inertia; and; for a given object, per definition of the center of mass, the mass is packed most closely to the axis of rotation when the axis of rotation passes through the center of mass.

Example 22-3

Find the moment of inertia of the rod from examples \(\ref{22-1}\) and \(\ref{22-2}\), with respect to an axis that is perpendicular to the rod and passes through the center of mass of the rod.

Solution

Recall that the rod in question extends along the \(x\) axis from \(x=0\) to \(x=L\) with \(L=0.890 m\) and that the rod has a linear density given by \(\mu=bL^2\) with \(b=0.650 \frac{kg}{m^3} x^2\). 

The axis in question can be chosen to be one that is parallel to the z axis, the axis about which, in solving example \(\ref{22-2}\), we found the moment of inertia to be \(I=0.0726kg \cdot m^2\). In solving example \(\ref{22-1}\) we found the mass of the rod to be \(m=0.1527 kg\) and the center of mass of the rod to be at a distance \(d=0.668 m\) away from the z axis. Here we present the solution to the problem: 

\[I=I_{cm}+md^2 \]

\[I_{cm}=I-md^2\]

\[I_{cm}=0.0726kg\cdot m^2-0.1527kg (0.668m)^2\]

\[I_{cm}=0.0047 kg\cdot m^2\]

Contributors