# 17.1: Solving Problems with Newton's Laws (Part 1)

- Page ID
- 63261

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

Success in problem solving is necessary to understand and apply physical principles. We developed a pattern of analyzing and setting up the solutions to problems involving Newton’s laws in Newton’s Laws of Motion; in this chapter, we continue to discuss these strategies and apply a step-by-step process.

## Problem-Solving Strategies

We follow here the basics of problem solving presented earlier in this text, but we emphasize specific strategies that are useful in applying Newton’s laws of motion. Once you identify the physical principles involved in the problem and determine that they include Newton’s laws of motion, you can apply these steps to find a solution. These techniques also reinforce concepts that are useful in many other areas of physics. Many problem-solving strategies are stated outright in the worked examples, so the following techniques should reinforce skills you have already begun to develop.

- Identify the physical principles involved by listing the givens and the quantities to be calculated.
- Sketch the situation, using arrows to represent all forces.
- Determine the system of interest, and draw a free body diagram.
- Apply Newton’s second law to solve the problem. If necessary, apply appropriate kinematic equations from the chapter on motion along a straight line.
- Check the solution to see whether it is reasonable.

Let’s apply this problem-solving strategy to the challenge of lifting a grand piano into a second-story apartment. Once we have determined that Newton’s laws of motion are involved (if the problem involves forces), it is particularly important to draw a careful sketch of the situation. Such a sketch is shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{1a}\). Then, as in Figure \(\PageIndex{1b}\), we can represent all forces with arrows. Whenever sufficient information exists, it is best to label these arrows carefully and make the length and direction of each correspond to the represented force.

**Figure ** **\(\PageIndex{1}\):**** (a) A grand piano is being lifted to a second-story apartment. (b) Arrows are used to represent all forces: \(\vec{T}\) is the tension in the rope above the piano, \(\vec{F}_{T}\) is the force that the piano exerts on the rope, and \(\vec{w}\) is the weight of the piano. All other forces, such as the nudge of a breeze, are assumed to be negligible. (c) Suppose we are given the piano’s mass and asked to find the tension in the rope. We then define the system of interest as shown and draw a free-body diagram. Now \(\vec{F}_{T}\) is no longer shown, because it is not a force acting on the system of interest; rather, \(\vec{F}_{T}\) acts on the outside world. (d) Showing only the arrows, the head-to-tail method of addition is used. It is apparent that if the piano is stationary, \(\vec{T}\) = \(- \vec{w}\).**

As with most problems, we next need to identify what needs to be determined and what is known or can be inferred from the problem as stated, that is, make a list of knowns and unknowns. It is particularly crucial to identify the system of interest, since Newton’s second law involves only external forces. We can then determine which forces are external and which are internal, a necessary step to employ Newton’s second law. (See Figure \(\PageIndex{1c}\).) Newton’s third law may be used to identify whether forces are exerted between components of a system (internal) or between the system and something outside (external). As illustrated in Newton’s Laws of Motion, the system of interest depends on the question we need to answer. Only forces are shown in free-body diagrams, not acceleration or velocity. We have drawn several free-body diagrams in previous worked examples. Figure \(\PageIndex{1c}\) shows a free-body diagram for the system of interest. Note that no internal forces are shown in a free-body diagram.

Once a free-body diagram is drawn, we apply Newton’s second law. This is done in Figure \(\PageIndex{1d}\) for a particular situation. In general, once external forces are clearly identified in free-body diagrams, it should be a straightforward task to put them into equation form and solve for the unknown, as done in all previous examples. If the problem is one-dimensional—that is, if all forces are parallel—then the forces can be handled algebraically. If the problem is two-dimensional, then it must be broken down into a pair of one-dimensional problems. We do this by projecting the force vectors onto a set of axes chosen for convenience. As seen in previous examples, the choice of axes can simplify the problem. For example, when an incline is involved, a set of axes with one axis parallel to the incline and one perpendicular to it is most convenient. It is almost always convenient to make one axis parallel to the direction of motion, if this is known. Generally, just write Newton’s second law in components along the different directions. Then, you have the following equations:

\[\sum F_{x} = m a_{x}, \quad \sum F_{y} = m a_{y}\ldotp\]

(If, for example, the system is accelerating horizontally, then you can then set ay = 0.) We need this information to determine unknown forces acting on a system.

As always, we must check the solution. In some cases, it is easy to tell whether the solution is reasonable. For example, it is reasonable to find that friction causes an object to slide down an incline more slowly than when no friction exists. In practice, intuition develops gradually through problem solving; with experience, it becomes progressively easier to judge whether an answer is reasonable. Another way to check a solution is to check the units. If we are solving for force and end up with units of millimeters per second, then we have made a mistake.

There are many interesting applications of Newton’s laws of motion, a few more of which are presented in this section. These serve also to illustrate some further subtleties of physics and to help build problem-solving skills. We look first at problems involving particle equilibrium, which make use of Newton’s first law, and then consider particle acceleration, which involves Newton’s second law.

## Particle Equilibrium

Recall that a particle in equilibrium is one for which the external forces are balanced. Static equilibrium involves objects at rest, and dynamic equilibrium involves objects in motion without acceleration, but it is important to remember that these conditions are relative. For example, an object may be at rest when viewed from our frame of reference, but the same object would appear to be in motion when viewed by someone moving at a constant velocity. We now make use of the knowledge attained in Newton’s Laws of Motion, regarding the different types of forces and the use of free-body diagrams, to solve additional problems in particle equilibrium.

Consider the traffic light (mass of 15.0 kg) suspended from two wires as shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\). Find the tension in each wire, neglecting the masses of the wires.

**Figure ** **\(\PageIndex{2}\):**** A traffic light is suspended from two wires. (b) Some of the forces involved. (c) Only forces acting on the system are shown here. The free-body diagram for the traffic light is also shown. (d) The forces projected onto vertical (y) and horizontal (x) axes. The horizontal components of the tensions must cancel, and the sum of the vertical components of the tensions must equal the weight of the traffic light. (e) The free-body diagram shows the vertical and horizontal forces acting on the traffic light.**

**Strategy**

The system of interest is the traffic light, and its free-body diagram is shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{2c}\). The three forces involved are not parallel, and so they must be projected onto a coordinate system. The most convenient coordinate system has one axis vertical and one horizontal, and the vector projections on it are shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{2d}\). There are two unknowns in this problem (T_{1} and T_{2}), so two equations are needed to find them. These two equations come from applying Newton’s second law along the vertical and horizontal axes, noting that the net external force is zero along each axis because acceleration is zero.

###### Solution

First consider the horizontal or x-axis:

\[F_{net x} = T_{2x} - T_{1x} = 0 \ldotp\]

Thus, as you might expect,

\[T_{1x} = T_{2x} \ldotp\]

This give us the following relationship:

\[T_{1} \cos 30^{o} = T_{2} \cos 45^{o} \ldotp\]

Thus,

\[T_{2} = 1.225 T_{1} \ldotp\]

Note that T_{1} and T_{2} are not equal in this case because the angles on either side are not equal. It is reasonable that T_{2} ends up being greater than T_{1} because it is exerted more vertically than T_{1}.

Now consider the force components along the vertical or y-axis:

\[F_{net y} = T_{1y} + T_{1x} - w = 0 \ldotp\]

This implies

\[T_{1y} + T_{2y} = w \ldotp\]

Substituting the expressions for the vertical components gives

\[T_{1} \sin 30^{o} + T_{2} \sin 45^{o} = w \ldotp\]

There are two unknowns in this equation, but substituting the expression for T_{2} in terms of T_{1} reduces this to one equation with one unknown:

\[T_{1} (0.500) + (1.225 T_{1})(0.707) = w = mg,\]

which yields

\[1.366 T_{1} = (15.0\; kg)(9.80\; m/s^{2}) \ldotp\]

Solving this last equation gives the magnitude of T_{1} to be

\[T_{1} = 108\; N \ldotp\]

Finally, we find the magnitude of T_{2} by using the relationship between them, T_{2} = 1.225 T_{1}, found above. Thus we obtain

\[T_{2} = 132\; N \ldotp\]

**Significance**

Both tensions would be larger if both wires were more horizontal, and they will be equal if and only if the angles on either side are the same (as they were in the earlier example of a tightrope walker in Newton’s Laws of Motion.)

Two tugboats push on a barge at different angles (Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\)). The first tugboat exerts a force of 2.7 x 10^{5 }N in the x-direction, and the second tugboat exerts a force of 3.6 x 10^{5} N in the y-direction. The mass of the barge is 5.0 × 10^{6} kg and its acceleration is observed to be 7.5 x 10^{−2} m/s^{2} in the direction shown. What is the drag force of the water on the barge resisting the motion? (**Note**: Drag force is a frictional force exerted by fluids, such as air or water. The drag force opposes the motion of the object. Since the barge is flat bottomed, we can assume that the drag force is in the direction opposite of motion of the barge.)

**Figure ** **\(\PageIndex{3}\):**** (a) A view from above of two tugboats pushing on a barge. (b) The free-body diagram for the ship contains only forces acting in the plane of the water. It omits the two vertical forces—the weight of the barge and the buoyant force of the water supporting it cancel and are not shown. Note that \(\vec{F}_{app}\) is the total applied force of the tugboats.**

**Strategy**

The directions and magnitudes of acceleration and the applied forces are given in Figure \(\PageIndex{3a}\). We define the total force of the tugboats on the barge as \(\vec{F}_{app}\) so that

\[\vec{F}_{app} = \vec{F}_{1} + \vec{F}_{2} \ldotp\]

The drag of the water \(\vec{F}_{D}\) is in the direction opposite to the direction of motion of the boat; this force thus works against \(\vec{F}_{app}\), as shown in the free-body diagram in Figure \(\PageIndex{3b}\). The system of interest here is the barge, since the forces on it are given as well as its acceleration. Because the applied forces are perpendicular, the x- and y-axes are in the same direction as \(\vec{F}_{1}\) and \(\vec{F}_{2}\). The problem quickly becomes a one-dimensional problem along the direction of \(\vec{F}_{app}\), since friction is in the direction opposite to \(\vec{F}_{app}\). Our strategy is to find the magnitude and direction of the net applied force \(\vec{F}_{app}\) and then apply Newton’s second law to solve for the drag force \(\vec{F}_{D}\).

###### Solution

Since F_{x} and F_{y} are perpendicular, we can find the magnitude and direction of \(\vec{F}_{app}\) directly. First, the resultant magnitude is given by the Pythagorean theorem:

\[ \vec{F}_{app} = \sqrt{F_{1}^{2} + F_{2}^{2}} = \sqrt{(2.7 \times 10^{5}\; N)^{2} + (3.6 \times 10^{5}\; N)^{2}} = 4.5 \times 10^{5} \; N \ldotp\]

The angle is given by

\[\theta = \tan^{-1} \left(\dfrac{F_{2}}{F_{1}}\right) = \tan^{-1} \left(\dfrac{3.6 \times 10^{5}\; N}{2.7 \times 10^{5}\; N}\right) = 53.1^{o} \ldotp\]

From Newton’s first law, we know this is the same direction as the acceleration. We also know that \(\vec{F}_{D}\) is in the opposite direction of \(\vec{F}_{app}\), since it acts to slow down the acceleration. Therefore, the net external force is in the same direction as \(\vec{F}_{app}\), but its magnitude is slightly less than \(\vec{F}_{app}\). The problem is now one-dimensional. From the free-body diagram, we can see that

\[F_{net} = F_{app} - F_{D} \ldotp\]

However, Newton's second law states that

\[F_{net} = ma \ldotp\]

Thus,

\[F_{app} - F_{D} = ma \ldotp\]

This can be solved for the magnitude of the drag force of the water F_{D} in terms of known quantities:

\[F_{D} = F_{app} - ma \ldotp\]

Substituting known values gives

\[F_{D} = (4.5 \times 10^{5}\; N) - (5.0 \times 10^{6}\; kg)(7.5 \times 10^{-2}\; m/s^{2}) = 7.5 \times 10^{4}\; N \ldotp\]

The direction of \(\vec{F}_{D}\) has already been determined to be in the direction opposite to \(\vec{F}_{app}\), or at an angle of 53° south of west.

**Significance**

The numbers used in this example are reasonable for a moderately large barge. It is certainly difficult to obtain larger accelerations with tugboats, and small speeds are desirable to avoid running the barge into the docks. Drag is relatively small for a well-designed hull at low speeds, consistent with the answer to this example, where F_{D} is less than 1/600th of the weight of the ship.

In Newton’s Laws of Motion, we discussed the normal force, which is a contact force that acts normal to the surface so that an object does not have an acceleration perpendicular to the surface. The bathroom scale is an excellent example of a normal force acting on a body. It provides a quantitative reading of how much it must push upward to support the weight of an object. But can you predict what you would see on the dial of a bathroom scale if you stood on it during an elevator ride?

Will you see a value greater than your weight when the elevator starts up? What about when the elevator moves upward at a constant speed? Take a guess before reading the next example.

Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\) shows a 75.0-kg man (weight of about 165 lb.) standing on a bathroom scale in an elevator. Calculate the scale reading: (a) if the elevator accelerates upward at a rate of 1.20 m/s^{2}, and (b) if the elevator moves upward at a constant speed of 1 m/s.

**Figure ** **\(\PageIndex{4}\):**** (a) The various forces acting when a person stands on a bathroom scale in an elevator. The arrows are approximately correct for when the elevator is accelerating upward—broken arrows represent forces too large to be drawn to scale. \(\vec{T}\) is the tension in the supporting cable, \(\vec{w}\) is the weight of the person, \(\vec{w}_{s}\) is the weight of the scale, \(\vec{w}_{e}\) is the weight of the elevator, \(\vec{F}_{s}\) is the force of the scale on the person, \(\vec{F}_{p}\) is the force of the person on the scale, \(\vec{F}_{t}\) is the force of the scale on the floor of the elevator, and \(\vec{N}\) is the force of the floor upward on the scale. (b) The free-body diagram shows only the external forces acting on the designated system of interest—the person—and is the diagram we use for the solution of the problem.**

**Strategy**

If the scale at rest is accurate, its reading equals \(\vec{F}_{p}\), the magnitude of the force the person exerts downward on it. Figure \(\PageIndex{4a}\) shows the numerous forces acting on the elevator, scale, and person. It makes this one-dimensional problem look much more formidable than if the person is chosen to be the system of interest and a free-body diagram is drawn, as in Figure \(\PageIndex{4b}\). Analysis of the free-body diagram using Newton’s laws can produce answers to both Figure \(\PageIndex{4a}\) and (b) of this example, as well as some other questions that might arise. The only forces acting on the person are his weight \(\vec{w}\) and the upward force of the scale \(\vec{F}_{s}\). According to Newton’s third law, \(\vec{F}_{p}\) and \(\vec{F}_{s}\) are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, so that we need to find F_{s} in order to find what the scale reads. We can do this, as usual, by applying Newton’s second law,

\[\vec{F}_{net} = m \vec{a} \ldotp\]

From the free-body diagram, we see that \(\vec{F}_{net} = \vec{F}_{s} - \vec{w}\), so we have

\[F_{s} - w = ma \ldotp\]

Solving for F_{s} gives us an equation with only one unknown:

\[F_{s} = ma + w,\]

or, because w = mg, simply

\[F_{s} = ma + mg \ldotp\]

No assumptions were made about the acceleration, so this solution should be valid for a variety of accelerations in addition to those in this situation. (**Note**: We are considering the case when the elevator is accelerating upward. If the elevator is accelerating downward, Newton’s second law becomes F_{s} − w = −ma.)

###### Solution

- We have a = 1.20 m/s
^{2}, so that $F_{s} = (75.0\; kg)(9.80\; m/s^{2}) + (75.0\; kg)(1.20\; m/s^{2})$yielding $F_{s} = 825\; N \ldotp$ - Now, what happens when the elevator reaches a constant upward velocity? Will the scale still read more than his weight? For any constant velocity—up, down, or stationary—acceleration is zero because \(a = \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}\) and \(\Delta v = 0\). Thus, $F_{s} = ma + mg = 0 + mg$or $F_{s} = (75.0\; kg)(9.80\; m/s^{2}),$which gives $F_{s} = 735\; N \ldotp$

**Significance**

The scale reading in Figure \(\PageIndex{4a}\) is about 185 lb. What would the scale have read if he were stationary? Since his acceleration would be zero, the force of the scale would be equal to his weight:

\[F_{net} = ma = 0 = F_{s} − w\]

\[F_{s} = w = mg\]

\[F_{s} = (75.0\; kg)(9.80\; m/s^{2}) = 735\; N \ldotp\]

Thus, the scale reading in the elevator is greater than his 735-N (165-lb.) weight. This means that the scale is pushing up on the person with a force greater than his weight, as it must in order to accelerate him upward.

Clearly, the greater the acceleration of the elevator, the greater the scale reading, consistent with what you feel in rapidly accelerating versus slowly accelerating elevators. In Figure \(\PageIndex{4b}\), the scale reading is 735 N, which equals the person’s weight. This is the case whenever the elevator has a constant velocity—moving up, moving down, or stationary.

Now calculate the scale reading when the elevator accelerates downward at a rate of 1.20 m/s^{2}.

The solution to the previous example also applies to an elevator accelerating downward, as mentioned. When an elevator accelerates downward, a is negative, and the scale reading is **less **than the weight of the person. If a constant downward velocity is reached, the scale reading again becomes equal to the person’s weight. If the elevator is in free fall and accelerating downward at g, then the scale reading is zero and the person appears to be weightless.

Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\) shows a block of mass m_{1} on a frictionless, horizontal surface. It is pulled by a light string that passes over a frictionless and massless pulley. The other end of the string is connected to a block of mass m_{2}. Find the acceleration of the blocks and the tension in the string in terms of m_{1}, m_{2}, and g.

**Figure ** **\(\PageIndex{5}\):**** (a) Block 1 is connected by a light string to block 2. (b) The free-body diagrams of the blocks.**

**Strategy**

We draw a free-body diagram for each mass separately, as shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\). Then we analyze each one to find the required unknowns. The forces on block 1 are the gravitational force, the contact force of the surface, and the tension in the string. Block 2 is subjected to the gravitational force and the string tension. Newton’s second law applies to each, so we write two vector equations:

For block 1: \(\vec{T} + \vec{w}_{1} + \vec{N} = m_{1} \vec{a}_{1}\)

For block 2: \(\vec{T} + \vec{w}_{2} = m_{2} \vec{a}_{2}\).

Notice that \(\vec{T}\) is the same for both blocks. Since the string and the pulley have negligible mass, and since there is no friction in the pulley, the tension is the same throughout the string. We can now write component equations for each block. All forces are either horizontal or vertical, so we can use the same horizontal/vertical coordinate system for both objects.

###### Solution

The component equations follow from the vector equations above. We see that block 1 has the vertical forces balanced, so we ignore them and write an equation relating the x-components. There are no horizontal forces on block 2, so only the y-equation is written. We obtain these results:

\[\sum F_{x} = m a_{x}\] \[T_{x} = m_{1} a_{1x}\] |
\[\sum F_{y} = m a_{y}\] \[T_{y} - m_{2}g = m_{2} a_{2y}\] |

When block 1 moves to the right, block 2 travels an equal distance downward; thus, a_{1x} = −a_{2y}. Writing the common acceleration of the blocks as a = a_{1x} = −a_{2y}, we now have

\[T = m_{1}a\]

and

\[T − m_{2}g = −m_{2}a \ldotp\]

From these two equations, we can express a and T in terms of the masses m_{1} and m_{2}, and g:

\[a = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}g\]

and

\[T = \frac{m_{1} m_{2}}{m_{1} + m_{2}} g \ldotp\]

**Significance**

Notice that the tension in the string is less than the weight of the block hanging from the end of it. A common error in problems like this is to set T = m_{2}g. You can see from the free-body diagram of block 2 that cannot be correct if the block is accelerating.

Calculate the acceleration of the system, and the tension in the string, when the masses are m_{1} = 5.00 kg and m_{2} = 3.00 kg.

A classic problem in physics, similar to the one we just solved, is that of the Atwood machine, which consists of a rope running over a pulley, with two objects of different mass attached. It is particularly useful in understanding the connection between force and motion. In Figure \(\PageIndex{6}\), m_{1} = 2.00 kg and m_{2} = 4.00 kg. Consider the pulley to be frictionless. (a) If m_{2} is released, what will its acceleration be? (b) What is the tension in the string?

**Figure** **\(\PageIndex{6}\):**** An Atwood machine and free-body diagrams for each of the two blocks.**

**Strategy**

We draw a free-body diagram for each mass separately, as shown in the figure. Then we analyze each diagram to find the required unknowns. This may involve the solution of simultaneous equations. It is also important to note the similarity with the previous example. As block 2 accelerates with acceleration a_{2} in the downward direction, block 1 accelerates upward with acceleration a_{1}. Thus, a = a_{1} = −a_{2}.

###### Solution

- We have $For\; m_{1}, \sum F_{y} = T − m_{1}g = m_{1}a \ldotp \quad For\; m_{2}, \sum F_{y} = T − m_{2}g = −m_{2}a \ldotp$(The negative sign in front of m
_{2}a indicates that m_{2}accelerates downward; both blocks accelerate at the same rate, but in opposite directions.) Solve the two equations simultaneously (subtract them) and the result is $(m_{2} - m_{1})g = (m_{1} + m_{2})a \ldotp$Solving for a: $a = \frac{m_{2} - m_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}g = \frac{4\; kg - 2\; kg}{4\; kg + 2\; kg} (9.8\; m/s^{2}) = 3.27\; m/s^{2} \ldotp$ - Observing the first block, we see that $T − m_{1}g = m_{1}a$ $T = m_{1}(g + a) = (2\; kg)(9.8\; m/s^{2} + 3.27\; m/s^{2}) = 26.1\; N \ldotp$

**Significance**

The result for the acceleration given in the solution can be interpreted as the ratio of the unbalanced force on the system, (m_{2} − m_{1})g, to the total mass of the system, m_{1} + m_{2}. We can also use the Atwood machine to measure local gravitational field strength.

Determine a general formula in terms of m_{1}, m_{2} and g for calculating the tension in the string for the Atwood machine shown above.