Skip to main content
Physics LibreTexts

5.1: Introduction

  • Page ID
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    This chapter deals with the calculation of gravitational fields and potentials in the vicinity of various shapes and sizes of massive bodies. The reader who has studied electrostatics will recognize that this is all just a repeat of what he or she already knows. After all, the force of repulsion between two electric charges \(q_1\) and \(q_2\) a distance \(r\) apart in vacuo is

    \[\frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi ε_0 r^2}, \]

    where \(ε_0\) is the permittivity of free space, and the attractive force between two masses \(M_1\) and \(M_2\) a distance \(r\) apart is

    \[\frac{GM_1 M_2}{r^2},\]

    where \(G\) is the gravitational constant, or, phrased another way, the repulsive force is

    \[-\frac{GM_1 M_2}{r^2}. \]

    Thus all the Equations for the fields and potentials in gravitational problems are the same as the corresponding Equations in electrostatics problems, provided that the charges are replaced by masses and \(4\pi ε_0\) is replaced by \(−1/G\).

    I can, however, think of two differences. In the electrostatics case, we have the possibility of both positive and negative charges. As far as I know, only positive masses exist. This means, among other things, that we do not have “gravitational dipoles” and all the phenomena associated with polarization that we have in electrostatics.

    The second difference is this. If a particle of mass \(m\) and charge \(q\) is placed in an electric field \(\textbf{E}\), it will experience a force \(q\textbf{E}\), and it will accelerate at a rate and in a direction given by \(q\textbf{E}/m\). If the same particle is placed in a gravitational field \(\textbf{g}\), it will experience a force \(m\textbf{g}\) and an acceleration \(m\textbf{g}/m = \textbf{g}\), irrespective of its mass or of its charge. All masses and all charges in the same gravitational field accelerate at the same rate. This is not so in the case of an electric field.

    I have some sympathy for the idea of introducing a “rationalized” gravitational constant \(Γ\), given by \(Γ = 1/(4 \pi G)\), in which case the gravitational formulas would look even more like the \(\text{SI}\) (rationalized \(\text{MKSA}\)) electrostatics formulas, with \(4\pi \) appearing in problems with spherical symmetry, \(2\pi\) in problems with cylindrical symmetry, and no \(\pi\) in problems involving uniform fields. This is unlikely to happen, so I do not pursue the idea further here.

    This page titled 5.1: Introduction is shared under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jeremy Tatum via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.

    • Was this article helpful?