# 6.1: Statics

- Page ID
- 19398

When using Newton’s Laws to model an object, one can identify two broad categories of situations: static and dynamic. In static situations, the acceleration of the object is zero. By Newton’s Second Law, this means that the vector sum of the forces (and torques, as we will see in a later chapter) exerted on an object must be zero. In dynamic situations, the acceleration of the object is non-zero.

For static problems, since the acceleration vector is zero, we can choose a coordinate system in a way that results in as many forces as possible being aligned with the axes (so that we minimize the number of forces that we need to break up into components).

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

You push horizontally with a force \(\vec F\) on a box of mass \(m\) that is resting against a vertical wall, as shown in* Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\)*. The coefficient of static friction between the wall and the box is \(\mu_s\). What is the minimum magnitude of the force that you must exert for the box to remain stationary?

**Solution**:

Since the acceleration of the box is zero, the vector sum of the forces exerted on the box is zero. We start by identifying the forces exerted on the box; these are:

- \(\vec F\), the horizontal force that you exert on the box.
- \(\vec F_g\), the weight of the box, with magnitude \(mg\).
- \(\vec N\), a normal force exerted by the wall on the box. The force is in the horizontal direction, in the opposite direction to \(\vec F\).
- \(\vec f_s\), a vertical force of static friction between the wall and the box. The force points upwards as the “impeding motion” of the block is downwards. The force will have at most a magnitude of \(f_s\leq\mu_s N\), since the force of static friction depends on the other forces exerted on the object.

The forces are shown in the free-body diagram in* Figure 6.1.2*, along with our choice of coordinate system which was chosen so that all forces are either in the \(x\) or \(y\) direction.

The \(x\) component of Newton’s Second Law is: \[\begin{aligned} \sum F_x = F - N &=0\\ \therefore N = F\end{aligned}\] which tells us that the normal force exerted by the wall has the same magnitude as the applied force, \(\vec F\). The \(y\) component of Newton’s Second Law is: \[\begin{aligned} \sum F_y = f_s - F_g &=0\\ \therefore f_s -mg &=0\\ \therefore f_s = mg\\\end{aligned}\] which tells us that the force of friction must have the same magnitude as the weight. This makes sense, since they are the only forces with components in the \(y\) direction, and thus, they must cancel each other out.

The force of friction will be less than or equal to \(\mu_sN\), and thus less than or equal to \(\mu_s F\), since \(\vec F\) and \(\vec N\) have the same magnitude (from the \(x\) component of Newton’s Second Law). Furthermore, since \(f_s=mg\), we can write: \[\begin{aligned} f_s &\leq \mu_s F\\ \therefore mg &\leq \mu_s F\\ \therefore \frac{mg}{\mu_s} &\leq F\end{aligned}\] which gives us the condition that \(F\geq mg/\mu_s\), and thus the minimum magnitude of \(F\) in order to keep the box from sliding down.

Although we used the lesser than or equal to sign in the above equations, we could have used an equal sign if we were confident that the force of friction has its maximal magnitude, \(f_s=\mu_sN\). The maximal magnitude of the force of friction is proportional to the force that we exert (since \(N=F\)); if we want to exert the least amount of force \(F\), then we need the force of friction to be equal to its maximal magnitude which needs to be equal to the weight of the box.

**Discussion:**

This model for the minimal required force makes sense because:

- The dimension of \(mg/\mu_s\) is force.
- If the mass of the box is increased, then one needs to push harder against the box to keep it up.
- If the coefficient of static friction, \(\mu_s\), is increased, one does not need to push as hard.