# 6.12: Mass and Weight

- Last updated

- Save as PDF

- Page ID
- 18159

- Contributed by OpenStax
- General Physics at OpenStax CNX

Learning Objectives

- Explain the difference between mass and weight
- Explain why falling objects on Earth are never truly in free fall
- Describe the concept of weightlessness

Mass and weight are often used interchangeably in everyday conversation. For example, our medical records often show our weight in kilograms but never in the correct units of newtons. In physics, however, there is an important distinction. Weight is the pull of Earth on an object. It depends on the distance from the center of Earth. Unlike weight, mass does not vary with location. The mass of an object is the same on Earth, in orbit, or on the surface of the Moon.

## Units of Force

The equation F_{net} = ma is used to define net force in terms of mass, length, and time. As explained earlier, the SI unit of force is the newton. Since F_{net} = ma,

$$1\; N = 1\; kg \cdotp m/s^{2} \ldotp \nonumber$$

Although almost the entire world uses the newton for the unit of force, in the United States, the most familiar unit of force is the pound (lb), where 1 N = 0.225 lb. Thus, a 225-lb person weighs 1000 N.

## Weight and Gravitational Force

When an object is dropped, it accelerates toward the center of Earth. Newton’s second law says that a net force on an object is responsible for its acceleration. If air resistance is negligible, the net force on a falling object is the gravitational force, commonly called its **weight **\(\vec{w}\), or its force due to gravity acting on an object of mass m. Weight can be denoted as a vector because it has a direction; *down *is, by definition, the direction of gravity, and hence, weight is a downward force. The magnitude of weight is denoted as w. Galileo was instrumental in showing that, in the absence of air resistance, all objects fall with the same acceleration g. Using Galileo’s result and Newton’s second law, we can derive an equation for weight.

Consider an object with mass m falling toward Earth. It experiences only the downward force of gravity, which is the weight \(\vec{w}\). Newton’s second law says that the magnitude of the net external force on an object is \(\vec{F}_{net} = m \vec{a}\). We know that the acceleration of an object due to gravity is \(\vec{g}\), or \(\vec{a} = \vec{g}\). Substituting these into Newton’s second law gives us the following equations.

Defintion: Weight

The gravitational force on a mass is its weight. We can write this in vector form, where \(\vec{w}\) is weight and m is mass, as

$$\vec{w} = m \vec{g} \ldotp \label{5.8}$$

In scalar form, we can write

$$w = mg \ldotp \label{5.9}$$

Since g = 9.80 m/s^{2} on Earth, the weight of a 1.00-kg object on Earth is 9.80 N:

$$w = mg = (1.00\; kg)(9.80 m/s^{2}) = 9.80\; N \ldotp$$

When the net external force on an object is its weight, we say that it is in **free fall**, that is, the only force acting on the object is gravity. However, when objects on Earth fall downward, they are never truly in free fall because there is always some upward resistance force from the air acting on the object.

Acceleration due to gravity g varies slightly over the surface of Earth, so the weight of an object depends on its location and is not an intrinsic property of the object. Weight varies dramatically if we leave Earth’s surface. On the Moon, for example, acceleration due to gravity is only 1.67 m/s^{2}. A 1.0-kg mass thus has a weight of 9.8 N on Earth and only about 1.7 N on the Moon.

The broadest definition of weight in this sense is that the weight of an object is the gravitational force on it from the nearest large body, such as Earth, the Moon, or the Sun. This is the most common and useful definition of weight in physics. It differs dramatically, however, from the definition of weight used by NASA and the popular media in relation to space travel and exploration. When they speak of “weightlessness” and “microgravity,” they are referring to the phenomenon we call “free fall” in physics. We use the preceding definition of weight, force \(\vec{w}\) due to gravity acting on an object of mass m, and we make careful distinctions between free fall and actual weightlessness.

Be aware that weight and mass are different physical quantities, although they are closely related. Mass is an intrinsic property of an object: It is a quantity of matter. The quantity or amount of matter of an object is determined by the numbers of atoms and molecules of various types it contains. Because these numbers do not vary, in Newtonian physics, mass does not vary; therefore, its response to an applied force does not vary. In contrast, weight is the gravitational force acting on an object, so it does vary depending on gravity. For example, a person closer to the center of Earth, at a low elevation such as New Orleans, weighs slightly more than a person who is located in the higher elevation of Denver, even though they may have the same mass.

It is tempting to equate mass to weight, because most of our examples take place on Earth, where the weight of an object varies only a little with the location of the object. In addition, it is difficult to count and identify all of the atoms and molecules in an object, so mass is rarely determined in this manner. If we consider situations in which \(\vec{g}\) is a constant on Earth, we see that weight \(\vec{w}\) is directly proportional to mass m, since \(\vec{w} = m \vec{g}\), that is, the more massive an object is, the more it weighs. Operationally, the masses of objects are determined by comparison with the standard kilogram, as we discussed in Units and Measurement. But by comparing an object on Earth with one on the Moon, we can easily see a variation in weight but not in mass. For instance, on Earth, a 5.0-kg object weighs 49 N; on the Moon, where g is 1.67 m/s^{2}, the object weighs 8.4 N. However, the mass of the object is still 5.0 kg on the Moon.

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Clearing a Field

A farmer is lifting some moderately heavy rocks from a field to plant crops. He lifts a stone that weighs 40.0 lb. (about 180 N). What force does he apply if the stone accelerates at a rate of 1.5 m/s^{2}?

**Strategy**

We were given the weight of the stone, which we use in finding the net force on the stone. However, we also need to know its mass to apply Newton’s second law, so we must apply the equation for weight, w = mg, to determine the mass.

**Solution**

No forces act in the horizontal direction, so we can concentrate on vertical forces, as shown in the following free-body diagram. We label the acceleration to the side; technically, it is not part of the free-body diagram, but it helps to remind us that the object accelerates upward (so the net force is upward).

$$w = mg \nonumber $$

$$m = \frac{w}{g} = \frac{180\; N}{9.8\; m/s^{2}} = 18\; kg \nonumber$$

$$\sum F = ma \nonumber$$

$$F - w = ma \nonumber$$

$$F - 180\; N = (18\; kg)(1.5\; m/s^{2}) \nonumber$$

$$F - 180\; N = 27\; N \nonumber$$

$$F = 207\; N = 210\; N\; \text{ to two significant figures} \nonumber$$

**Significance**

To apply Newton’s second law as the primary equation in solving a problem, we sometimes have to rely on other equations, such as the one for weight or one of the kinematic equations, to complete the solution.

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

For \(\PageIndex{1}\), find the acceleration when the farmer’s applied force is 230.0 N.

**Answer**-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Simulation

Can you avoid the boulder field and land safely just before your fuel runs out, as Neil Armstrong did in 1969? This version of the classic video game accurately simulates the real motion of the lunar lander, with the correct mass, thrust, fuel consumption rate, and lunar gravity. The real lunar lander is hard to control.

Phet Simulation

Use this interactive simulation to move the Sun, Earth, Moon, and space station to see the effects on their gravitational forces and orbital paths. Visualize the sizes and distances between different heavenly bodies, and turn off gravity to see what would happen without it.

## Contributors

Samuel J. Ling (Truman State University), Jeff Sanny (Loyola Marymount University), and Bill Moebs with many contributing authors. This work is licensed by OpenStax University Physics under a Creative Commons Attribution License (by 4.0).