Skip to main content
Physics LibreTexts

The Main Phase Transition

  • Page ID
    868
  • The membranes that provide structure and definition to cellular compartments are composed of dynamic and heterogeneous lipids whose varying chemical properties allow for their function. The transition between the two main phases of a lipid bilayer, the liquid crystalline phase (Lα) and the gel phase (Lβ) determines how the membrane will behave in terms of fluidity at a particular temperature and the formation of biologically useful membrane microdomains.

    Relevant Properties of Lipid Phases

    Membranes composed of a lipid bilayer can exist in either the liquid or gel phase, depending on the strength of interaction between the molecules. The two phases are quite different in their physical properties and biological relevance.

    A. Lα

    The Lα, or “liquid” phase, is characterized by more thermal motion than the gel phase. Head groups in the liquid phase are loosely packed with rotational freedom, giving rise to a larger area per molecule at room temperature than observed in the gel phase[1]. The acyl chain tails are not rigid or efficiently packed due to the presence of “kinks” caused by gauche orientation of the alkane chain.
    In the liquid phase, phospholipid molecules can move freely in the X and Y axis, but distance between the bilayers (the Z axis direction) is shorter in than in the gel phase, as would be expected due to the kinks in the hydrophobic tails
    [2]. The presence of gel phase domains within the bilayer can inhibit the lateral diffusion of liquid phase molecules[3].

    B.
    Lβ

    In the Lβ phase, or “gel” phase, acyl chain tails are fully extended and a uniform trans orientation is present for the length of the alkyl chain. This gives the gel phase a longer Z axis, or length, because the acyl chains are more rigid and straight.
    Tightly packed head groups result in a lower area per molecule at room temperature than in the liquid phase
    [1].

    Ehrenfest’s Definition of Phase Transition

    The Austrian physicist Paul Ehrenfest provided a definition for phase transitions, where phase behavior is described in terms of free energy (ΔG) as a function of different thermodynamic variables. The “order” is the derivative of ΔG (as a function of some physical or chemical variable) and the point at which it is discontinuous is the point of phase change[4].

    Physical state phase changes, such as the transition between a solid, liquid, gas (or liquid to gel state of a lipid bilayer) are first order phase transitions because they are discontinuous in density at their Tm, which is the first derivative of ΔG with respect to chemical potential.

    In a second order phase transition, the first derivative of ΔG is continuous but the second derivative is discontinuous for the second derivative of ΔG. Magnetization is an example of a second order phase transition process.
    The phase transition of gel to liquid is a first order process and involves a latent heat, in which the thermodynamic system (membrane) absorbs or emits a fixed amount of enthalpy ΔS.
    During phase transition, the temperature stays constant while heat is added to the system[4].

     

    phase changes.png
    A simplified diagram of phase change

    The heat flow required for a first order phase change can be modeled as TΔS. Plotting heat flow versus temperature shows intuitively the energy required for phase transition, with an integral of the curved area representing the free energy of the process:


    t delta s.png
     

    Hysteresis is the phenomenon where there is a difference in Tm depending on which direction the phase transition is going (a difference between Tliquid→geland Tgel→liquid).This phenomenon occurs only in first and not second order phase transitions[5].

    Characteristics of Phase Transitions

    The close packing of the gel phase is accomplished in part by the long and straight acyl chains. These chains are kept straight and rigid by the trans orientation of the alkane chain. During phase transitions, the acyl chain portion of the phospholipid hydrophobic tail undergoes a trans-gauche isomerization produces kinks, a shorter and skewed tail, and leads to less efficient packing[6].

    Biologically relevant membranes exist as complex mixtures of different lipids with varying melting temperatures. As a fraction of the membrane reaches its phase transition temperature (Tm) a mixed phase will exist with a heterogenous mixture of liquid and gel phases. Should a sufficient amount of mixed phase exist, a substantial amount of lipid molecules may become exposed to an aqueous environment as the liquid phase molecules will be shorter in the Z axis than the gel phase, making the membrane thinner and exposing a portion of the hydrophobic tails of adjacent phospholipid molecules. This phenomenon is known as “Hydrophobic mismatch” and is the driving force for phase separation. Thus, the disparity of phase transition temperatures in complex lipid mixtures of a lipid bilayer can be thought of as a driving force for phase separation and microdomain formation[7].

    Forces Driving Phase Transition

    Lipids undergo temperature specific phase transitions from liquid crystalline to gel phase. The specific temperature at which this transition occurs is referred to as Tm and varies depending on the specific molecule. Lipid molecules with longer acyl chains tend to have higher Tm than shorter tailed phospholipids because the longer tail provides more opportunity for Van der Waals interactions to occur between two adjacent molecules, lowering over all energy and requiring more thermal energy to reach the point of phase transition and making the phospholipid more likely to exist in the gel phase[5].

    Double bonding within the acyl chain also affects Tm[8].  Unsaturated lipids have a lower Tm whereas saturated lipids have a higher Tm. In addition to the degree of unsaturation or number of double bonds, the position of the double bond in the acyl chain also affects phase behavior[7]

    In addition to the acyl tail, the lipid headgroup also influences phase behavior. The size of the headgroup is thought to have a strong influence on Tm. Glycocylated head groups have been shown to exhibit less hydrogen bonding than normal phosphatidylcholine resulting in a more fluid and flexible membrane
    [9]. Somewhat related, the surrounding pH and the hydration of the membrane can also affect Tm, with lower pH and higher hydration state resulting in a higher Tm for the same lipid composition by affecting the hydrogen bonding between the lipid components[10].
     

    crowe etal.PNG

    Change in melting temperature for lipids  in pollen grains containing different water contents[11]

    Techniques for Detecting and Measuring Phase Transitions

    Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a technique that can be used to measure phase transitions in lipid samples and even in simple cells like intact bacteria[12]. DSC works by measuring the amount of heat energy required to raise the temperature of the sample. By slowly ramping the temperature of the sample and accurately measuring temperature change, DSC can determine phase transition phases. By conducting a DSC scan in both directions, hysteresis can be identified. 

    Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is a powerful technique that can provide a wealth of information about lipid structure, membrane organization and phase behavior[13]. FTIR detects the absorbance of IR type light emission, which at certain wavelengths is absorbed by different carbon-carbon bonds. From FTIR absorbance spectra, information about lipid conformation can be extrapolated. For example, the phase transition from gel to liquid phase represent change from a more ordered to a more disordered state; the disordered state provides for more rotational and vibrational freedom of the lipid molecules, which is accompanied by a broadening of the IR absorbance of the higher energy molecule[14]. It has been used to find Tm of intact cells, including human platelets[15].

     

    ruthven.PNG

    FTIR spectra showing the C-H stretch at 6° of DMPS in an aqeous buffer[14]

    Biological Consequences

    Packing defects of the lipid bilayer can lead to leakage during phase transition the formation of microdomains that occurs as consequence of phase separation can alter the curvature and fluidity of the membrane, which can impart new biological characteristics to the plasma membrane, tonoplast or a vesicle. In addition, protein movement through the membrane can be impaired, or a protein could be restricted to a lipid environment in which it does not optimally function.[16]

    Myelin is a notable exception to the general rule that lipids are fluid during physiological temperatures. In persons with multiple sclerosis, the Tm of myelin is lowered by 20°C[17], altering the physical properties of neuronal myelin sheath and possibly causing increased susceptibility to degradation[18].

    References

    1. Nagle, J.F., Theory of lipid monolayer and bilayer phase transitions: Effect of headgroup interactions. The Journal of Membrane Biology, 1976. 27(1): p. 233-250.
    2. John, K., et al., Transbilayer Movement of Phospholipids at the Main Phase Transition of Lipid Membranes: Implications for Rapid Flip-Flop in Biological Membranes. Biophysical Journal, 2002. 83(6): p. 3315-3323.
    3. Ratto, T.V. and M.L. Longo, Obstructed diffusion in phase-separated supported lipid bilayers: a combined atomic force microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching approach. Biophys J, 2002. 83(6): p. 3380-92.
    4. Jaeger, G., The Ehrenfest Classification of Phase Transitions: Introduction and Evolution. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 1998. 53(1): p. 51-81.
    5. Faller, R., MCB/PBH 241 Course Lectures. 2014.
    6. Hjort Ipsen, J., et al., Phase equilibria in the phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol system. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1987. 905(1): p. 162-172.
    7. Wallace, E.J., N.M. Hooper, and P.D. Olmsted, Effect of hydrophobic mismatch on phase behavior of lipid membranes. Biophys J, 2006. 90(11): p. 4104-18.
    8. Applegate, K.R. and J.A. Glomset, Effect of acyl chain unsaturation on the packing of model diacylglycerols in simulated monolayers. J Lipid Res, 1991. 32(10): p. 1645-55.
    9. Popova, A.V. and D.K. Hincha, Effects of the sugar headgroup of a glycoglycerolipid on the phase behavior of phospholipid model membranes in the dry state. Glycobiology, 2005. 15(11): p. 1150-5.
    10. Seddon, J.M., et al., Phosphatidylcholine–fatty acid membranes: effects of headgroup hydration on the phase behaviour and structural parameters of the gel and inverse hexagonal (HII) phases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1997. 1327(1): p. 131-147.
    11. Crowe, J.H., et al., Lipid phase transitions measured in intact cells with fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Cryobiology, 1989. 26(1): p. 76-84.
    12. Lepock, J.R., H.E. Frey, and W.E. Inniss, Thermal analysis of bacteria by differential scanning calorimetry: relationship of protein denaturation in situ to maximum growth temperature. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1990. 1055(1): p. 19-26.
    13. Lewis, R.N. and R.N. McElhaney, Membrane lipid phase transitions and phase organization studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2013. 1828(10): p. 2347-58.
    14. Lewis, R.N.A.H. and R.N. McElhaney, Membrane lipid phase transitions and phase organization studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 2013. 1828(10): p. 2347-2358.
    15. Tablin, F., et al., Membrane phase transition of intact human platelets: Correlation with cold-induced activation. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 1996. 168(2): p. 305-313.
    16. van Meer, G., D.R. Voelker, and G.W. Feigenson, Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2008. 9(2): p. 112-24.
    17. Chia, L.S., J.E. Thompson, and M.A. Moscarello, Alteration of lipid-phase behavior in multiple sclerosis myelin revealed by wide-angle x-ray diffraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1984. 81(6): p. 1871-4.
    18. Moscarello, M.A., et al., Myelin in multiple sclerosis is developmentally immature. J Clin Invest, 1994. 94(1): p. 146-54.