Skip to main content
Physics LibreTexts

12.1: Preliminary Analysis

  • Page ID
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    Suppose that at \(t=0\) the state of the system is represented by \[\psi(0) = \sum_m c_m\,\psi_m,\] where the \(c_m\) are complex numbers. Thus, the initial state is some linear superposition of the unperturbed energy eigenstates. In the absence of the time-dependent perturbation, the time evolution of the system is simply (see Section [sstat]) \[\psi(t) = \sum_m c_m\,\exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_m\,t/\hbar\right)\psi_m.\] Now, the probability of finding the system in state \(n\) at time \(t\) is \[P_n(t) = |\langle \psi_n|\psi\rangle|^{\,2} = \left| c_n\,\exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_n\,t/\hbar\right)\right|^{\,2} = |c_n|^{\,2} = P_n(0),\] because the unperturbed eigenstates are assumed to be orthonormal: that is, \[\label{e13.6} \langle n|m\rangle =\delta_{nm}.\] Clearly, with \(H_1=0\), the probability of finding the system in state \(\psi_n\) at time \(t\) is exactly the same as the probability of finding the system in this state at the initial time, \(t=0\). However, with \(H_1\neq 0\), we expect the \(P_n\)—and, hence, the \(c_n\)—to vary with time. Thus, we can write \[\label{e13.7} \psi(t) = \sum_m c_m(t)\,\exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_m\,t/\hbar\right)\psi_m,\] where \(P_n(t)=|c_n(t)|^{\,2}\). Here, we have carefully separated the fast phase oscillation of the eigenstates, which depends on the unperturbed Hamiltonian, from the slow variation of the amplitudes \(c_n(t)\), which depends entirely on the perturbation (i.e., \(c_n\) is constant in time if \(H_1=0\)). Note that in Equation ([e13.7]) the eigenstates \(\psi_m\) are time-independent (they are actually the eigenstates of \(H_0\) evaluated at the initial time, \(t=0\)).

    The time-dependent Schrödinger equation [see Equation ([etimed])] yields \[\label{e13.8} {\rm i}\,\hbar\,\frac{\partial\psi(t)}{\partial t} = H(t)\,\psi(t) = [H_0+H_1(t)]\,\psi(t).\] Now, it follows from Equation ([e13.7]) that \[(H_0+H_1)\,\psi = \sum_m c_m\,\exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_m\,t/\hbar\right)(E_m+H_1)\,\psi_m.\] We also have \[{\rm i}\,\hbar\,\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} = \sum_m\left({\rm i}\,\hbar\,\frac{d c_m}{dt}+ c_m\,E_m\right) \exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_m\,t/\hbar\right)\psi_m,\] because the \(\psi_m\) are time-independent. According to Equation ([e13.8]), we can equate the right-hand sides of the previous two equations to obtain \[\sum_m {\rm i}\,\hbar\,\frac{dc_m}{dt}\,\exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_m\,t/\hbar\right)\psi_m = \sum_m c_m\,\exp\left(-{\rm i}\,E_m\,t/\hbar\right)H_1\,\psi_m.\] Projecting out the component of the previous equation which is proportional to \(\psi_n\), using Equation ([e13.6]), we obtain \[\label{e13.12} {\rm i}\,\hbar\,\frac{dc_n(t)}{dt} = \sum_m H_{nm}(t)\,\exp\left(\,{\rm i}\, \omega_{nm}\,t\right)c_m(t),\] where \[H_{nm}(t) = \langle n|H_1(t)|m\rangle,\] and \[\omega_{nm} = \frac{E_n-E_m}{\hbar}.\] Suppose that there are \(N\) linearly independent eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. According to Equations ([e13.12]), the time dependence of the set of \(N\) coefficients \(c_n\), which specify the probabilities of finding the system in these eigenstates at time \(t\), is determined by \(N\) coupled first-order differential equations. Note that Equations ([e13.12]) are exact—we have made no approximations at this stage. Unfortunately, we cannot generally find exact solutions to these equations. Instead, we have to obtain approximate solutions via suitable expansions in small quantities. However, for the particuilarly simple case of a two-state system (i.e., \(N=2\)), it is actually possible to solve Equations ([e13.12]) without approximation. This solution is of great practical importance.

    12.1: Preliminary Analysis is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Richard Fitzpatrick.

    • Was this article helpful?