12.2: Two-State System
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
Consider a system in which the time-independent Hamiltonian possesses two eigenstates, denoted H0ψ1=E1ψ1,H0ψ2=E2ψ2. Suppose, for the sake of simplicity, that the diagonal elements of the interaction Hamiltonian, H1, are zero: that is, ⟨1|H1|1⟩=⟨2|H1|2⟩=0. The off-diagonal elements are assumed to oscillate sinusoidally at some frequency ω: that is, ⟨1|H1|2⟩=⟨2|H1|1⟩∗=γℏexp(iωt), where γ and ω are real. Note that it is only the off-diagonal matrix elements which give rise to the effect which we are interested in: namely, transitions between states 1 and 2.
For a two-state system, Equation ([e13.12]) reduces to
idc1dt=γexp[+i(ω−ω21)t]c2,idc2dt=γexp[−i(ω−ω21)t]c1, where ω21=(E2−E1)/ℏ. The previous two equations can be combined to give a second-order differential equation for the time-variation of the amplitude c2: that is,
d2c2dt2+i(ω−ω21)dc2dt+γ2c2=0. Once we have solved for c2, we can use Equation ([e13.20]) to obtain the amplitude c1. Let us search for a solution in which the system is certain to be in state 1 (and, thus, has no chance of being in state 2) at time t=0. Thus, our initial conditions are c1(0)=1 and c2(0)=0. It is easily demonstrated that the appropriate solutions to ([e13.21]) and ([e13.20]) are
c2(t)=(−iγΩ)exp[−i(ω−ω21)t2]sin(Ωt)
c1(t)=exp[i(ω−ω21)t2]cos(Ωt)−[i(ω−ω21)2Ω]exp[i(ω−ω21)t2]sin(Ωt)
where Ω=√γ2+(ω−ω21)2/4
Now, the probability of finding the system in state 1 at time t is simply P1(t)=|c1(t)|2. Likewise, the probability of finding the system in state 2 at time t is P2(t)=|c2(t)|2. It follows that P1(t)=1−P2(t),P2(t)=[γ2γ2+(ω−ω21)2/4]sin2(Ωt). This result is known as Rabi’s formula .
Equation ([e13.25]) exhibits all the features of a classic resonance . At resonance, when the oscillation frequency of the perturbation, ω, matches the frequency ω21, we find that
P1(t)=cos2(γt),P2(t)=sin2(γt). According to the previous result, the system starts off in state 1 at t=0. After a time interval π/(2γ) it is certain to be in state 2. After a further time interval π/(2γ) it is certain to be in state 1 again, and so on. Thus, the system periodically flip-flops between states 1 and 2 under the influence of the time-dependent perturbation. This implies that the system alternatively absorbs and emits energy from the source of the perturbation.
The absorption-emission cycle also takes place away from the resonance, when ω≠ω21. However, the amplitude of the oscillation in the coefficient c2 is reduced. This means that the maximum value of P2(t) is no longer unity, nor is the minimum of P1(t) zero. In fact, if we plot the maximum value of P2(t) as a function of the applied frequency, ω, then we obtain a resonance curve whose maximum (unity) lies at the resonance, and whose full-width half-maximum (in frequency) is 4γ. Thus, if the applied frequency differs from the resonant frequency by substantially more than 2γ then the probability of the system jumping from state 1 to state 2 is always very small. In other words, the time-dependent perturbation is only effective at causing transitions between states 1 and 2 if its frequency of oscillation lies in the approximate range ω21±2γ. Clearly, the weaker the perturbation (i.e., the smaller γ becomes), the narrower the resonance.
Contributors and Attributions
Richard Fitzpatrick (Professor of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin)