5.4: Harmonic Perturbation
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
This is generally useful since by Fourier analysis we can decompose any periodic perturbation into harmonic components.
Let the perturbing potential be V(r,t)=V(r)cosωt
If the initial state at t=0 is k, and the final state m then
cm≈−iℏVmk∫t0eiωmkt12(eiwt+e−iwt)dt=Vmk2ℏ(ei(ωmk−ω)t−1ωmk−ω+ei(ωmk+ω)t−1ωmk+ω)
where Vmk is the time independent part of the matrix element ⟨m|ˆV|k⟩. This function is dominated by the first term in the region around ωmk=ω, so we can consider only the first term to obtain an estimate for the transition probability:
|cm(t)|2=V2mksin2[(ωmk−ω)t/2]ℏ2(ωmk−ω)2=14ℏ2V2mkf(t,ωmk−ω)
Where the function f is the same as we encountered earlier. Thus an external perturbation at a given frequency most strongly induces transitions between energy levels separated by ℏω.
This is another manifestation of an uncertainty principle. If the potential is electromagnetic, the most probable transition is the absorption of a ℏωmk photon as the system changes energy by ℏωmk. But if the transition happens very fast, the peak is broad and the photon could have a wide range of energies, contrariwise, if the transition occurs after a long time the photon frequency is well defined: ΔEΔt≥ℏ/2. This uncertainty gives rise to the ‘natural linewidth’ of a particular transition, and causes a limit to the accuracy of certain experiments. There is a slight difference from the Heisenberg Uncertainty in non-relativistic quantum mechanics because time is not an operator so one cannot define the commutator of time with the Hamiltonian.
Note the extraordinary result that the transition probability at small times is (V2mk/4ℏ2)t2. Consider what happens if the state is measured frequently compared to if measurements are made infrequently: frequent measurement tends to inhibit the transition!