Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Physics LibreTexts

6.7: Checking that We Can Eliminate the q˙i's

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

We should check that we can in fact write

H(pi,qi)=ni=1pi˙qiL(qi,˙qi)

as a function of just the variables (qi,pi), with all trace of the ˙qi’s eliminated. Is this always possible? The answer is yes.

Recall the ˙qi’s only appear in the Lagrangian in the kinetic energy term, which has the general form

T=i,jaij(qk)˙qi˙qj

where the coefficients aij depend in general on some of the qk's but are independent of the velocities, the ˙qk 's.  Therefore, from the definition of the generalized momenta,

pi=L˙qi=nj=1aij(qk)˙qj

and we can write this as a vector-matrix equation,

p=A˙q

That is, pi is a linear function of the ˙qj 's. . Hence, the inverse matrix A1 will give us ˙qi as a linear function of the pj's, and then putting this expression for the ˙qi into the Lagrangian gives the Hamiltonian as a function only of the qi's and the pi's, that is, the phase space variables.

The matrix A is always invertible because the kinetic energy is positive definite (as is obvious from its Cartesian representation) and a symmetric positive definite matrix has only positive eigenvalues, and therefore is invertible.


This page titled 6.7: Checking that We Can Eliminate the q˙i's is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Michael Fowler.

Support Center

How can we help?