14.6: Hard-Sphere Scattering
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
Let us test out this scheme using a particularly simple example. Consider scattering by a hard sphere, for which the potential is infinite for r<a, and zero for r>a. It follows that ψ(r) is zero in the region r<a, which implies that ul=0 for all l. Thus, βl−=βl+=∞, for all l. Equation ([e17.82]) thus gives tanδl=jl(ka)yl(ka).
Consider the l=0 partial wave, which is usually referred to as the S-wave. Equation ([e17.90]) yields tanδ0=sin(ka)/ka−cos(ka)/ka=−tan(ka), where use has been made of Equations ([e17.58a]) and ([e17.58b]). It follows that δ0=−ka. The S-wave radial wave function is [see Equation ([e17.80])] R0(r)=exp(−ika)[cos(ka)sin(kr)−sin(ka)cos(kr)]kr=exp(−ika)sin[k(r−a)]kr. The corresponding radial wavefunction for the incident wave takes the form [see Equation ([e15.49])] ˜R0(r)=sin(kr)kr. Thus, the actual l=0 radial wavefunction is similar to the incident l=0 wavefunction, except that it is phase-shifted by ka.
Let us examine the low- and high-energy asymptotic limits of tanδl. Low energy implies that ka≪1. In this regime, the spherical Bessel functions reduce to: jl(kr)≃(kr)l(2l+1)!!,yl(kr)≃−(2l−1)!!(kr)l+1, where n!!=n(n−2)(n−4)⋯1. It follows that tanδl=−(ka)2l+1(2l+1)[(2l−1)!!]2. It is clear that we can neglect δl, with l>0, with respect to δ0. In other words, at low energy, only S-wave scattering (i.e., spherically symmetric scattering) is important. It follows from Equations ([e15.17]), ([e17.73]), and ([e17.92]) that dσdΩ=sin2kak2≃a2 for ka≪1. Note that the total cross-section σtotal=∫dσdΩdΩ=4πa2 is four times the geometric cross-section πa2 (i.e., the cross-section for classical particles bouncing off a hard sphere of radius a). However, low energy scattering implies relatively long wavelengths, so we would not expect to obtain the classical result in this limit.
Consider the high-energy limit ka≫1. At high energies, all partial waves up to lmax=ka contribute significantly to the scattering cross-section. It follows from Equation ([e17.75]) that σtotal≃4πk2∑l=0,lmax(2l+1)sin2δl. With so many l values contributing, it is legitimate to replace sin2δl by its average value 1/2. Thus, σtotal≃∑l=0,ka2πk2(2l+1)≃2πa2. This is twice the classical result, which is somewhat surprising, because we might expect to obtain the classical result in the short-wavelength limit. For hard-sphere scattering, incident waves with impact parameters less than a must be deflected. However, in order to produce a “shadow” behind the sphere, there must also be some scattering in the forward direction in order to produce destructive interference with the incident plane-wave. (Recall the optical theorem.) In fact, the interference is not completely destructive, and the shadow has a bright spot (the so-called “Poisson spot” ) in the forward direction. The effective cross-section associated with this bright spot is πa2 which, when combined with the cross-section for classical reflection, πa2, gives the actual cross-section of 2πa2.
Contributors and Attributions
Richard Fitzpatrick (Professor of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin)