14.2: Born Approximation
- Page ID
- 15814
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Equation ([e15.17]) is not particularly useful, as it stands, because the quantity \(f({\bf k},{\bf k}')\) depends on the, as yet, unknown wavefunction \(\psi({\bf r})\). [See Equation ([e5.12]).] Suppose, however, that the scattering is not particularly strong. In this case, it is reasonable to suppose that the total wavefunction, \(\psi({\bf r})\), does not differ substantially from the incident wavefunction, \(\psi_0({\bf r})\). Thus, we can obtain an expression for \(f({\bf k},{\bf k}')\) by making the substitution \(\psi({\bf r})\rightarrow\psi_0({\bf r}) = \sqrt{n}\,\exp(\,{\rm i}\, {\bf k}\cdot{\bf r})\) in Equation ([e5.12]). This procedure is called the Born approximation .
The Born approximation yields \[f({\bf k},{\bf k}') \simeq \frac{m}{2\pi\,\hbar^{\,2}} \int {\rm e}^{\,{\rm i}\,({\bf k}-{\bf k'})\cdot{\bf r}'}\,V({\bf r'})\,d^{\,3}{\bf r}'.\] Thus, \(f({\bf k},{\bf k}')\) becomes proportional to the Fourier transform of the scattering potential \(V({\bf r})\) with respect to the wavevector \({\bf q} = {\bf k}-{\bf k}'\).
For a spherically symmetric potential, \[f({\bf k}', {\bf k}) \simeq - \frac{m}{2\pi\, \hbar^{\,2}} \int\!\int\!\int \exp(\,{\rm i} \, q \,r'\cos\theta') \, V(r')\,r'^{\,2}\, dr'\,\sin\theta' \,d\theta'\,d\phi',\] giving \[\label{e17.38} f({\bf k}', {\bf k}) \simeq - \frac{2\,m}{\hbar^{\,2}\,q} \int_0^\infty r' \,V(r') \sin(q \,r') \,dr'.\] Note that \(f({\bf k}', {\bf k})\) is just a function of \(q\) for a spherically symmetric potential. It is easily demonstrated that \[\label{e17.39} q \equiv |{\bf k} - {\bf k}'| = 2\, k \,\sin (\theta/2),\] where \(\theta\) is the angle subtended between the vectors \({\bf k}\) and \({\bf k}'\). In other words, \(\theta\) is the scattering angle. Recall that the vectors \({\bf k}\) and \({\bf k}'\) have the same length, via energy conservation.
Consider scattering by a Yukawa potential ,
\[\label{e10.35ee} V(r) = \frac{V_0\,\exp(-\mu \,r)}{\mu \,r},\] where \(V_0\) is a constant, and \(1/\mu\) measures the “range” of the potential. It follows from Equation ([e17.38]) that \[f(\theta) = - \frac{2\,m \,V_0}{\hbar^{\,2}\,\mu} \frac{1}{q^{\,2} + \mu^{\,2}},\] because \[\int_0^\infty \exp(-\mu \,r') \,\sin(q\,r') \, dr' = \frac{q}{q^{\,2}+ \mu^{\,2}}.\] Thus, in the Born approximation, the differential cross-section for scattering by a Yukawa potential is \[\frac{d\sigma}{d {\mit\Omega}} \simeq \left(\frac{2\,m \,V_0}{ \hbar^{\,2}\,\mu}\right)^2 \frac{1}{[2\,k^{\,2}\, (1-\cos\theta) + \mu^{\,2}]^{\,2}},\] given that \[q^{\,2} = 4\,k^{\,2}\, \sin^2(\theta/2) = 2\,k^{\,2}\, (1-\cos\theta).\]
The Yukawa potential reduces to the familiar Coulomb potential as \(\mu \rightarrow 0\), provided that \(V_0/\mu \rightarrow Z\,Z'\, e^{\,2} / (4\pi\,\epsilon_0)\). In this limit, the Born differential cross-section becomes \[\frac{d\sigma}{d{\mit\Omega}} \simeq \left(\frac{2\,m \,Z\, Z'\, e^{\,2}}{4\pi\,\epsilon_0\,\hbar^{\,2}}\right)^2 \frac{1}{ 16 \,k^{\,4}\, \sin^4( \theta/2)}.\] Recall that \(\hbar\, k\) is equivalent to \(|{\bf p}|\), so the previous equation can be rewritten \[\label{e17.46} \frac{d\sigma}{d{\mit\Omega}} \simeq\left(\frac{Z \,Z'\, e^{\,2}}{16\pi\,\epsilon_0\,E}\right)^2 \frac{1}{\sin^4(\theta/2)},\] where \(E= p^{\,2}/2\,m\) is the kinetic energy of the incident particles. Of course, Equation ([e17.46]) is identical to the famous Rutherford scattering cross-section formula of classical physics .
The Born approximation is valid provided that \(\psi({\bf r})\) is not too different from \(\psi_0({\bf r})\) in the scattering region. It follows, from Equation ([e15.9]), that the condition for \(\psi({\bf r}) \simeq \psi_0({\bf r})\) in the vicinity of \({\bf r} = {\bf 0}\) is \[\label{e17.47} \left| \frac{m}{2\pi\, \hbar^{\,2}} \int \frac{ \exp(\,{\rm i}\, k \,r')}{r'} \,V({\bf r}')\,d^{\,3}{\bf r'} \right| \ll 1.\] Consider the special case of the Yukawa potential. At low energies, (i.e., \(k\ll \mu\)) we can replace \(\exp(\,{\rm i}\,k\, r')\) by unity, giving \[\frac{2\,m}{\hbar^{\,2}} \frac{|V_0|}{\mu^{\,2}} \ll 1\] as the condition for the validity of the Born approximation. The condition for the Yukawa potential to develop a bound state is \[\frac{2\,m}{\hbar^{\,2}} \frac{|V_0|} {\mu^{\,2}} \geq 2.7,\] where \(V_0\) is negative . Thus, if the potential is strong enough to form a bound state then the Born approximation is likely to break down. In the high-\(k\) limit, Equation ([e17.47]) yields \[\frac{2\,m}{\hbar^{\,2}} \frac{|V_0|}{\mu \,k} \ll 1.\] This inequality becomes progressively easier to satisfy as \(k\) increases, implying that the Born approximation is more accurate at high incident particle energies.
Contributors and Attributions
Richard Fitzpatrick (Professor of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin)
\( \newcommand {\ltapp} {\stackrel {_{\normalsize<}}{_{\normalsize \sim}}}\) \(\newcommand {\gtapp} {\stackrel {_{\normalsize>}}{_{\normalsize \sim}}}\) \(\newcommand {\btau}{\mbox{\boldmath$\tau$}}\) \(\newcommand {\bmu}{\mbox{\boldmath$\mu$}}\) \(\newcommand {\bsigma}{\mbox{\boldmath$\sigma$}}\) \(\newcommand {\bOmega}{\mbox{\boldmath$\Omega$}}\) \(\newcommand {\bomega}{\mbox{\boldmath$\omega$}}\) \(\newcommand {\bepsilon}{\mbox{\boldmath$\epsilon$}}\)