Search
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/04%3A_Bra-ket_Formalism/4.08%3A_Exercise_ProblemsIn a certain basis, the Hamiltonian of a two-level system is described by the matrix \[\mathrm{H}=\left(E100E2\right), \quad \text { with } E_{1} \neq E_{...In a certain basis, the Hamiltonian of a two-level system is described by the matrix H=(E100E2), with E1≠E2, while the operator of some observable A of this system, by the matrix A=(1111). For the system’s state with the energy definitely equal to E1, find the possible results of measurements of the observable A…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/08%3A_Multiparticle_Systems/8.02%3A_Singlets_Triplets_and_the_Exchange_InteractionIndeed, in the 1st approximation of the perturbation theory, the total energy Ee of the system may be expressed as \(\varepsilon_{100}+\varepsilon_{n l m}+E_{\text {int...Indeed, in the 1st approximation of the perturbation theory, the total energy Ee of the system may be expressed as ε100+εnlm+Eint (1), with \[E_{\text {int }}^{(1)}=\left\langle U_{\text {int }}\right\rangle=\int d^{3} r_{1} \int d^{3} r_{2} \psi_{\mathrm{e}}^{*}\left(\mathbf{r}_{1}, \mathbf{r}_{2}\right) U_{\text {int }}\left(\mathbf{r}_{1}, \mathbf{r}_{2}\right) \psi_{\mathrm{e}}\left(\mathbf{r}_{1}, \mathbf{r}_{…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/02%3A_1D_Wave_Mechanics/2.05%3A_Motion_in_Soft_PotentialsAs a result, we get the following (still approximate!) result:\[\begin{gathered} \frac{d \Phi_{1}}{d x}=\frac{i}{2} \frac{d^{2} \Phi_{0}}{d x^{2}} / \frac{d \Phi_{0}}{d x}=\frac{i}{2} \frac{d}{d x}\le...As a result, we get the following (still approximate!) result:\[\begin{gathered} \frac{d \Phi_{1}}{d x}=\frac{i}{2} \frac{d^{2} \Phi_{0}}{d x^{2}} / \frac{d \Phi_{0}}{d x}=\frac{i}{2} \frac{d}{d x}\left(\ln \frac{d \Phi_{0}}{d x}\right)=\frac{i}{2} \frac{d}{d x}[\ln k(x)]=i \frac{d}{d x}\left[\ln k^{1 / 2}(x)\right], \\ \left.i \Phi\right|_{\mathrm{WKB}} \equiv i \Phi_{0}+i \Phi_{1}=\pm i \int^{x} k\left(x^{\prime}\right) d x^{\prime}+\ln \frac{1}{k^{1 / 2}(x)}, \\ \psi_{\mathrm{WKB}}(x)=\frac{…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/03%3A_Higher_Dimensionality_Effects/3.04%3A_Energy_Bands_in_Higher_DimensionsThe key notion of the band theory in d dimensions is the reciprocal lattice in the wave-vector (q) space, formed as Q=d∑j=1ljbj, with integer lj, and ...The key notion of the band theory in d dimensions is the reciprocal lattice in the wave-vector (q) space, formed as Q=d∑j=1ljbj, with integer lj, and vectors bj selected in such a way that the following natural generalization of Eq. (104) is valid for any pair of points of the direct and reciprocal lattices: eiQ⋅R=1. One way to describe the physical sense of the lattice Q is to say th…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/02%3A_1D_Wave_Mechanics/2.10%3A_Harmonic_Oscillator-_Brute_Force_ApproachNow let us use Eq. (1.23) for a similar calculation of the expectation value of the system’s Hamiltonian in the trial state: 87 \[\begin{aligned} \langle H\rangle_{\text {trial }} &=\int \ps...Now let us use Eq. (1.23) for a similar calculation of the expectation value of the system’s Hamiltonian in the trial state: 87 \[\begin{aligned} \langle H\rangle_{\text {trial }} &=\int \psi_{\text {trial }}^{*} \hat{H} \psi_{\text {trial }} d^{3} x \equiv \sum_{n, n^{\prime}} \int \alpha_{n}^{*} \psi_{n}^{*} \hat{H} \alpha_{n^{\prime}} \psi_{n^{\prime}} d^{3} x \equiv \sum_{n, n^{\prime}} \alpha_{n^{\prime}} \alpha_{n}^{*} E_{n^{\prime}} \int \psi_{n}^{*} \psi_{n^{\prime}} d^{3} x \…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/09%3A_Elements_of_Relativistic_Quantum_Mechanics/9.06%3A_Diracs_TheoryThe particular form of the 2×2 matrices corresponding to the operators ˆσ and ˆI in Eq. (98a) depends on the basis selected for the spin state representa...The particular form of the 2×2 matrices corresponding to the operators ˆσ and ˆI in Eq. (98a) depends on the basis selected for the spin state representation; for example, in the standard z-basis, in which the Cartesian components of ˆσ are represented by the Pauli matrices (4.105), the 4×4 matrix form of Eq. (98a) is \[\alpha_{x}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ …
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/03%3A_Higher_Dimensionality_Effects/3.07%3A_AtomsBecause of this reason, n is usually called the principal quantum number, and the above relation between it and the "more subordinate" orbital quantum number l is rewritten as l≤n−1....Because of this reason, n is usually called the principal quantum number, and the above relation between it and the "more subordinate" orbital quantum number l is rewritten as l≤n−1. Together with the inequality (162), this gives us the following, very important hierarchy of the three quantum numbers involved in the Bohr atom problem: 1≤n≤∞⇒0≤l≤n−1⇒−l≤m≤+l Taking into account the (2l+1)-d…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/05%3A_Some_Exactly_Solvable_Problems/5.04%3A_Revisiting_Harmonic_OscillatorTaking all phases φn and φn ’ equal to zero for simplicity, we may spell out Eqs. (82) as 32 \[\hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle=(n+1)^{1 / 2}|n+1\rangle, \quad \hat{a}|n\ran...Taking all phases φn and φn ’ equal to zero for simplicity, we may spell out Eqs. (82) as 32 ˆa†|n⟩=(n+1)1/2|n+1⟩,ˆa|n⟩=n1/2|n−1⟩. Now we can use these formulas to calculate, for example, the matrix elements of the operator ˆx in the Fock state basis: \[\begin{aligned} \left\langle n^{\prime}|\hat{x}| n\right\rangle & \equiv x_{0}\left\langle n^{\prime}|\hat{\xi}| n\right\rangle=\frac{x_{0…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/01%3A_Introduction/1.06%3A_Time_Evolution7, in which externally applied voltage V fixes the difference ϕ1−ϕ2 between the electrochemical potentials of two superconductors, Eq. (72) takes the form \[\frac{d \varphi}{d t}=\...7, in which externally applied voltage V fixes the difference ϕ1−ϕ2 between the electrochemical potentials of two superconductors, Eq. (72) takes the form dφdt=2eℏV. If the link between the superconductors is weak enough, the electric current I of the Cooper pairs (called the supercurrent) through the link may be approximately described by the following simple relation, I=Icsinφ, where Ic is so…
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/zz%3A_Back_Matter
- https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Quantum_Mechanics/Essential_Graduate_Physics_-_Quantum_Mechanics_(Likharev)/05%3A_Some_Exactly_Solvable_Problems/5.02%3A_The_Ehrenfest_TheoremTo derive them, for the simplest case of 1D orbital motion, let us calculate the following commutator: \[\left[\hat{x}, \hat{p}_{x}^{2}\right] \equiv \hat{x} \hat{p}_{x} \hat{p}_{x}-\hat{p}_{x} \hat{p...To derive them, for the simplest case of 1D orbital motion, let us calculate the following commutator: [ˆx,ˆp2x]≡ˆxˆpxˆpx−ˆpxˆpxˆx. Let us apply the commutation relation (4.238) in the following form: ˆxˆpx=ˆpxˆx+iℏˆI, to the first term of the right-hand side of Eq. (24) twice, with the goal to move the coordinate operator to the rightmost position: \[\hat{x}…